Подпороговая и пороговая визуальная стимуляция при психофизиологическом тестировании на полиграфе
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Купцова Д.М., Каменсков М.Ю., Рыбин П.В. Подпороговая и пороговая визуальная стимуляция при психофизиологическом тестировании на полиграфе // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2019. №2. С. 54-63.
В оригинальном исследовании с целью определения возможности применения подпороговой визуальной стимуляции при тестировании на полиграфе для диагностики парафильных расстройств было обследовано 70 мужчин. Использовали клинико-психопатологический, психологический, сексологический и психофизиологический методы. По итогам проведённого исследования, в рамках которого впервые была оценена возможность использования подпороговой визуальной стимуляции во время тестирования на полиграфе, можно сделать вывод о том, что изменение вегетативных процессов не позволяет судить о значимости предъявляемых стимулов, и рекомендуется проведение подобных исследований, связанных с регистрацией потенциалов головного мозга.
Ключевые слова визуальная стимуляция; пороговое восприятие; подпороговое восприятие; полиграф
1. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73(6):1154–63. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 2. Filippova MG. [Perception without awareness and the appropriateness of his participation in psychodiagnostic research]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University]. 2008;(2):101–8. Russian. 3. Spiering M, Evaraerd W, Janssen E. Priming the sexual system. Implicit versus explicit activation. Journal of Sex Research. 2003;40:134–45. DOI: 10.1080/00224490309552175 4. Janssen E, Everaerd W, Spiering M, Janssen J. Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: towards an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research. 2000;37:8–23. 5. Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Shaver P.R. Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effects on men and women. Journal of Sex Research. 2007;44:111–21. DOI: 10.1080/00224490701263579 6. Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Shaver P.R. When sex primes love: Subliminal sexual priming motivates relational goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008;34:1057–69. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208318141 7. Gillath O, Canterberry M. Neural correlates of exposure to subliminal and supraliminal sexual cues. Social cognitive affective neuroscience. 2012;7(8):924–36. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr065 8. Bargh JA. What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;36(2):147–68. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.336 9. Georgiadis JR, Kringelbach ML. The human sexual response cycle: brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Progress in neurobiology. 2012;98(1):49–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.004 10. Oglobin SI, Molchanov AYu. Instrumental'naya «detektsiya lzhi»: akademicheskiy kurs. Yaroslavl. 2004. 464 p. Russian. 11. Ivanov RS. [Individual symptom complex as a tool for interpreting the results of psycho-physiological research using a polygraph]. Natsional'nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. 2014;(3):90–7. Russian. 12. Pelenitsyn AB, Soshnikov AP. Sovremennyye tekhnologii primeneniya poligrafa. Moscow; 2015. 224 p. Russian. 13. Gougler M, Chair C, Handler M, et al. Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques. Polygraph. 2011;40(4):194–295. 14. Kuptsova DM, Kamenskov MYu. [Influence of psychosexual and psychological factors on]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2018;8(1):13–25. Russian. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080102 15. Kamenskov MYu. Kliniko-patogeneticheskiye i diagnosticheskiye aspekty parafiliy i ikh sudebno-psikhiatricheskoye znacheniye [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Natsional'nyy meditsinskiy issledovatel'skiy tsentr psikhiatrii i narkologii imeni VP Serbskogo [National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology named after VP Serbian]; 2017. 45 p. Russian. 16. Marko M, Riečanský I. Sympathetic arousal, but not disturbed executive functioning, mediates the impairment of cognitive flexibility under stress. Cognition. 2018;174:94–102. 17. Zahn TP, Rosenthal D, Lawlor WG. Electrodermal and heart rate orienting reactions in chronic schizophrenia. Journal of psychiatric research. 1968;6:117–34. 18. Chong LL, Evian G, Anthony H, et al. Electrodermal activity in schizophrenia: a quantitative study using a short interstimulus paradigm. Biological Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):127–35. 19. Perry W, Felger T, Braff D. The relationship between skin conductance hyporesponsivity and perseverations in schizophrenia patients. Biological Psychiatry. 1998;44(6):459–65. 20. Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2015;15(10):483–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 21. Ameller A, Picard A, D'Hondt F, et al. Implicit Recognition of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in Schizophrenia: A Study of the Skin Conductance Response in Familiarity Disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8(181):490–501. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00181 22. Rachow T, Berger S, Boettger MK, et al. Nonlinear relationship between electrodermal activity and heart rate variability in patients with acute schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(10):1323–32. 23. Wang P, Gao Y, Isen J, et al. Genetic covariance between psychopathic traits and anticipatory skin conductance responses to threat: Evidence for a potential endophenotype. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27(4Pt1):1313–22. 24. Patrick CJ, Iacono WG. Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1989;74(2):347–55. 25. Floch M. Limitations of the lie detector. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1950;40:651–2. 26. Vvedenskij GE, Safuanov FS, Kamenskov MJu, et al. [Poll using a polygraph: the psychiatric contraindications]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2011;5:31–6. Russian. 27. Spiering M, Everaerd W. The sexual unconscious. In: Janssen E, ed. The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2007;166–84. 28. Graf H, Wiegers M, Metzger CD, et al. Differential Noradrenergic Modulation of Monetary Reward and Visual Erotic Stimulus Processing. Front Psychiatry. 2018;31(9):346. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00346 29. Habermeyer B, Händel N, Lemoine P, et al. LH-RH agonists modulate amygdala response to visual sexual stimulation: a single case fMRI study in pedophilia. Neurocase. 2012;18(6):489–95. 30. Brand M, Snagowski J, Laier C, Maderwald S. Ventral striatum activity when watching preferred pornographic pictures is correlated with symptoms of Internet pornography addiction. Neuroimage. 2016;1(129):224–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.033 31. Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Händel N, et al. Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in paedophilia and controls: a case control study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;19(13):88. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-88 32. Goldman-Rakic PS. The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1996;351(1346):1445–53. 33. Kirenskaya А, Kamenskov М, Myamlin V, et al. The antisaccade task performance deficit and specific CNV abnormalities in patients with stereotyped paraphilia and schizophrenia. Journal of forensic sciences. 2013;58(5):1219–26. 34. Wernicke M, Hofter C, Jordan K, et al. Neural correlates of subliminally presented visual sexual stimuli. Conscious Cognition. 2017;49:35–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.011 35. Kostandov E, Arzumanov Y. Evoked cortical potentials on emotional unconscious words. ZHurnal vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti im. IP Pavlova [Journal of higher nervous activity by IP Pavlov]. 1974;3:465.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2019-11921
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM