Современная диагностика расстройств сексуального предпочтения (международный опыт)
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Ткаченко А.А., Каменсков М.Ю., Демидова Л.Ю. Современная диагностика расстройств сексуального предпочтения (международный опыт) // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2017. №6. С. 60-69.
Представлен информационно-аналитический обзор, целью которого является ознакомление с современными (клиническими, психофизиологическими, нейрофизиологическими, психологическими) подходами к диагностике расстройств сексуального предпочтения в мировой практике. Сделан акцент на опыт США, Канады, Великобритании и Чешской Республики. Способы оценки, используемые специалистами отмеченных стран, сопоставляются с организацией дифференциальной диагностики расстройств сексуального предпочтения в Российской Федерации. Статья приурочена к Международной встрече, посвященной способам оценки и лечения лиц с сексуальными отклонениями, состоявшейся в 2017 году в Чешской Республике и проходившей в рамках Меморандума, заключенного между ФГБУ «ФМИЦПН им. В.П. Сербского» и несколькими медицинскими и научно-исследовательскими центрами Канады. Ключевые слова: парафилии, сексуальные предпочтения, педофилия, сексология, диагностика, психофизиология.
Ключевые слова paraphilias; sexual preferences; pedophilia; sexology; diagnosis; psychophysiology
1. Tkachenko AA, Vvedenskiy GE, Dvoryanchikov NV. Sudebnaya seksologiya. Moscow: Binom, 2014: 648 p. Russian 2. Mysterious A. [Pedophilia and children pornography in context of contemporary society]. Nezavisimyy psikhiatricheskiy zhurnal [Independent psychiatric journal]. 2016;1:18-39. Russian 3. Saleh FM, Grudzinskas AJ, Malin HM, Dwyer RG. The management of sex offenders: perspectives for psychiatry. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010;18(6):359-68. 4. McGrath R, Cumming G, Burchard B, Zeoli S, Ellerby L. Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press, 2010: 140 p. 5. Dwyer RG, Letourneau EJ. Juveniles who sexually offend: recommending a treatment program and level of care. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011;30(3):413-29. 6. Klapilová K, Brody S, Krej čová L, Hus árová B, Binter J. Sexual satisfaction, sexual compatibility, and relationship adjustment in couples: the role of sexual behaviors, orgasm and men's discernment o women's intercourse orgasm. J Sex Med. 2015;12(3):667-75. 7. Klapilová K, Binter J, Radim K, Jaroslav V. Seeking for sexual normality: sexual activities across Czech population. J Sex Med. 2016;13(5, suppl. 2):S226. 8. Binter J, Schejbalova A, Bártová K, Vanletova, Varella J, Krejcova L, Weiss P, Kleisner K, Keil P, Klapilova K. Prevalence of zoophilia in Czech sado-masochistic community. J Sex Med. 2015;12(suppl. 1):41. 9. Murphy L, Ranger R, Stewart H, Dwyer G, Fedoroff JP. Assessment of problematic sexual Interest with the penile plethysmograph: an overview of assessment laboratories. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(5):29. 10. Moulden HM, Firestone P, Kingston D, Bradford J. Recidivism in pedophiles: an investigation using different diagnostic methods. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20(5):680-701. 11. Seto MC, Fedoroff JP, Bradford JM, Knack N, Rodrigues NC, et al. Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV-TR and proposed DSM-5 criteria for pedophilia: Implications for the ICD-11 and the next DSM. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016;49(Pt A):98-106. 12. Rosenzweig S. The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1942;4(2):150-8. 13. Abel GG, Huffman J, Warberg B, Holland C. Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 1998;10(2):81-95. 14. Imhoff R, Schmidt AF, Nordsiek U, Luzar C, Young AW, Banse R. Viewing time effects revisited: prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets under restricted task conditions. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(6):1275-88. 15. Imhoff R, Schmidt AF, Weiß S, Young AW, Banse R. Vicarious viewing time: prolonged response latencies for sexually attractive targets as a function of task- or stimulus-specific processing. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(6):1389–401. 16. Schmidt A.F., Babchishin K.M., Lehmann R.J.B. A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(1):287-300. 17. Pohl A, Wolters A, Ponseti J. Investigating the task dependency of viewing time effects. J Sex Res. 2016;53(8):1027-35. 18. Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H, von Herder J, Witzel J, Stolpmann G, Kröner‐Herwig B, Müller JL. Diagnostic accuracy of eye movements in assessing pedophilia. J Sex Med. 2012;9(7):1868–82. 19. Jordan K, Fromberger P, von Herder J, Steinkrauss H, Nemetschek R, Witzel J, Müller JL. Impaired attentional control in pedophiles in a sexual distractor task. Front psychiatry. 2016;7:193. 20. Murphy L, Ranger R, Fedoroff JP, Stewart H, Dwyer RG, Burke W. Standardization of penile plethysmography testing in assessment of problematic sexual interests. J Sex Med. 2015;12(9):1853-61. 21. Freund K. A laboratory method for diagnosing predominance of homo- or hetero-erotic interest in the male. Behav Res Ther 1963;1(1):85-93. 22. Lykins AD, Cantor JM, Kuban ME, Blak T, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Blanchard R. The relation between peak response magnitudes and agreement in diagnoses obtained from two different phallometric tests for pedophilia. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 2010;22(1):42-57. 23. Wilson RJ, Abracen J, Looman J, Picheca JE, Ferguson M. Pedophilia: an evaluation of diagnostic and risk prediction methods. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 2011;23(2):260-74. 24. Müller K, Curry S, Ranger R, Briken P, Bradford ., Fedoroff JP. Changes in sexual arousal as measured by penile plethysmography in men with pedophilic sexual interest. J Sex Med. 2014;11(5):1221-9. 25. Purcell MS, Chandler JA, Fedoroff JP. The use of phallometric evidence in Canadian criminal law. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015;43(2):141-53. 26. Merdian HL, Jones DT. Phallometric assessment of sexual arousal. In: International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: theory, practice, and research. Edited by DP Boer, R Eher, LA Craig, MH Miner, F Pfäfflin. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011:141-70. 27. Hughes JR. Review of medical reports on pedophilia. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007;46(8):667-82. 28. Babchishin KM, Curry SD, Fedoroff JP, Bradford J, Seto MC. Inhibiting sexual arousal to children: correlates and its influence on the validity of penile plethysmography. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(3):671-84. 29. Knack NM, Murphy L, Ranger R, Meston C, Fedoroff JP. Assessment of female sexual arousal in forensic populations. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(4):1-8. 30. Cross T, Saxe L. Polygraph testing and sexual abuse: the lure of the magic lasso. Child Maltreat. 2001;6(3):195-206. 31. Ahlmeyer S, Heil P, McKee B, English K. The impact of polygraphy on admissions of victims and offenses in adult sexual offenders. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 2000;12(2):123-38. 32. Grubin D. The polygraph and forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(4):446-51. 33. Grubin D, Madsen L. Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188(5):479-83. 34. Bell BG, Grubin D. Functional magnetic resonance imaging may promote theoretical understanding of the polygraph test. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2010;21(1):52-65. 35. Grubin D. The case for polygraph testing of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2008;13(2):177-89. 36. Kamenskov MY. [Validity of the psychophysiological diagnosis of paraphylia]. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry im SS Korsakova. 2013;113 (3-1):39-44. Russian 37. National Research Council. The polygraph and Lie Detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence of the Polygraph. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003:416 p. 38. Ben-Shakhar G. The case against the use of polygraph examinations to monitor post-conviction sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2008;13(2):191-207. 39. Kleiner M. Physiological detection of deception in psychological perspectives: a theoretical proposal. In: Handbook of polygraph testing. Edited by M Kleiner. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2002:127-82. 40. Honts CR, Nodes RL, Raskin DC. Effects of physical countermeasures on the physiological detection of deception. J Appl Psychol. 1985;70(1):177-87. 41. Cheng JC, Secondary J, Burke WH, Fedoroff JP, Dwyer RG. Neuroimaging and sexual behavior: identification of regional and functional differences. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015;17(7):55. 42. Binter J, Klapilová K, Zikánová T, Nilsson T, Bártová K, Krejčová L, Androvičová R, Lindová J, Průšová D, Wells T, Riha D. Exploring the pathways of adaptation an avatar 3D animation procedures and virtual reality arenas in research of human courtship behaviour and sexual reactivity in psychological research. In: Virtual Worlds: The Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Intersections. Edited by P Jerry, N Tavares-Jones. Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2016:294-305. 43. Renaud P, Trottier D, Rouleau J-L, Goyette M, Saumur C, Boukhalfi T, Bouchard S. Using immersive virtual reality and anatomically correct computer-generated characters in the forensic assessment of deviant sexual preferences. Virtual Reality. 2014;18(1):37-47. 44. Fedoroff JP, Peyser C, Franz ML, Folstein SE. Sexual disorders in Huntington's disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994;6(2):147-53. 45. Mohnke S, Müller S, Amelung T, Krüger TH, Ponseti J, Schiffer B, Walter M, Beier KM, Walter H. Brain alterations in paedophilia: a critical review. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;122:1-23. 46. Stoléru S, Fonteille V, Cornélis C, Joyal C, Moulier V. Functional neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and women: a review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(6):1481-509. 47. Knott V, Impey D, Fedoroff P, Fisher D, Delpero E. Pedophilic brain potential responses to adult erotic stimuli. Brain Res. 2016;1632:127-40. 48. Mihailides S, Devilly GJ, Ward T. Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 2004;16(4):333-50. 49. Navathe S, Ward T, Gannon T. Cognitive distortions in child sex offenders: an overview of theory, research and practice. J Forensic Nurs. 2008;4(3):111-22. 50. Bumby KM. Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 1996;8(1):37-54. 51. Pervan S, Hunter M. Cognitive distortions and social self-esteem in sexual offenders. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice. 2007;3(1):75-91. 52. Abel GG, Becker JV, Cunningham-Rathner J. Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1984;7(1):89-103. 53. Burt MR. Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;38(2):217-30. 54. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The DSFI: a multidimensional measure of sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther. 1979;5(3):244-81. 55. Seto MC, Laumiére ML. A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sex Abuse: J Res Treat. 2001;13(1):15-25. 56. Winder B, Lievesly R, Kaul A, Elliott HJ, Thorne K, Hocken K. Preliminary evaluation of the use of pharmacological treatment with convicted sexual offenders experiencing high levels of sexual preoccupation, hypersexuality and/or sexual compulsivity. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2014;25(2):176-94. 57. Kalichman SC, Johnson JR, Adair V, Rompa D, Multhauf K, Kelly JA. Sexual sensation seeking: scale development and predicting AIDS-risk behavior among homosexually active men. J Pers Assess. 1994;62(3):385-97. 58. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychol Assess. 2009;21 (1):1-21. 59. Fedoroff JP. Sadism, sadomasochism, sex, and violence. Can J Psychiatry. 2008;53(10):637-46. 60. Marlow K, Winder B, Elliott HJ. Working with transgendered sex offenders: prison staff experiences. Journal of Forensic Practice. 2015;17(3):241-54. 61. Ward T, Marshall B. Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2007;51(3):279-97.
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM