Психосоциальные характеристики лиц с виртуальным аномальным сексуальным поведением и механизмы реализации таких поведенческих паттернов
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Корчагин В.В., Каменсков М.Ю. Психосоциальные характеристики лиц с виртуальным аномальным сексуальным поведением и механизмы реализации таких поведенческих паттернов // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2021. №5. С. 73-82.
В научном обзоре с целью формирования представлений о лицах, совершающих преступления сексуального характера посредством информационно-телекоммуникационных технологий, были изучены электронные ресурсы научной электронной библиотеки eLibrary.ru и базы данных MEDLINE Национальной медицинской библиотеки США. Представлены результаты наиболее значимых исследований, раскрывающие особенности данной когорты лиц в социальной, личностной, психической и психосексуальной сферах, а также механизмов виртуального девиантного поведения и осознанно-волевой регуляции. Рассматривается роль сети Интернет как особой среды, способствующей реализации аномальных сексуальных побуждений.
Ключевые слова интернет; сексуальные расстройства; виртуальные преступления; парафилии; аномальное сексуальное поведение
1. Internet v Rossii: dinamika proniknoveniya. Zima 2017–2018 gg. URL: https://fom.ru/SMI-i-internet/13999 (accessed on: 25.06.2021). (In Russ.) 2. Kende A, Ujhelyi A, Joinson A, Greitemeyer T. Putting the social (psychology) into social media. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2015;45:277–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2097 3. Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzing A, Őlafsson K. With members of the EU kids online network. EU kids online. London. Final report. September 2011. 54 p. 4. Smahel D, Machackova H, Mascheroni G, et al. EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo 5. Tkhostov ASH, Surnov KG. Vliyaniye sovremennykh tekhnologiy na razvitiye lichnosti i formirovaniye patologicheskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2005;(6):16–24. (In Russ.) 6. Lowry PB, Zhang J, Wang C, Siponen M. Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research. 2016;27:962–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0671 7. Marzouki Y. La conscience collective virtuelle: un nouveau paradigme des comportements collectifs en ligne. In: G Lo Monaco, S Delouvée, P Rateau (eds). Les représentations sociales. Théories, méthodes et applications. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur; 2016. p. 413–5. 8. Guegan J. Effets de contexte et modulation des processus sociocognitifs via Internet. Psychologie. Thèse de doctorat en psychologie sociale. Université Paul Valéry – Montpellier III, 2012. 232 p. 9. Joinson AN. Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In: J Gackenbach (ed.). Psychology and the Internet. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 2007. p. 43–60. 10. Moor L, Anderson J. A systematic literature review of the relationship between dark personality traits and antisocial online behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019;144:40–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.027 11. Udris R. Psychological and social factors as predictors of online and offline deviant behavior among Japanese adolescents. Deviant Behavior. 2017;38:792–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1197689 12. Cheung CMK, Wong RYM, Chan TKH. Online disinhibition: conceptualization, measurement, and relation to aggressive behavior. Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems. Dublin. 2016. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/Sustainability/Presentations/2/ (accessed on: 25.06.2021). 13. Piper S. Workplace toxic online disinhibition. Presented to the interdisciplinary studies program: University of Oregon applied information management. 2015. 48 p. 14. Vilanova F, Beria FM, Costa AB, Koller SH. Deindividuation: From Le Bon to the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Cogent Psychology. 2017;4(1):1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1308104 15. Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior. 2004;7:321–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295 16. Finkelhor D, Ormrod R, Turner H, Hamby SL. The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment. 2005;10:5–25. 17. Mitchel KJ, Finkelhor D, Wolak J. Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. JAMA. 2001;285:3011–4. 18. Wolak J, Finkelhor D, Mitchell KJ. Trends in arrests for child pornography possession: the third national juvenile online victimization study (NJOV-3). Durham. Crimes Against Children Research Center. 2012. P. 1–6. 19. German Federal Statistical Office. Rechtspflege Strafverfolgung 2002 (2004). URL: https://www.destatis.de/GPStatistik/servlets/ MCRFileNodeServlet/DEHeft_derivate_00006761/2100300027004.pdf (accessed on: 05.07.2021). 20. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS, First MB. Sexual and other axis I diagnoses of 60 males arrested for crimes against children involving the Internet. CNS Spectrum. 2009;14(11):623–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852900023865 21. Motivans M, Kyckelhahn T. Federal Prosecution of Child Sex Exploitation Offenders, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2007. URL: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/fpcseo06.pdf (accessed on: 10.07.2021). 22. Blanchard R, Kolla NJ, Cantor JM, et al. IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sex Abuse. 2007;19:285–309. 23. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS, First MB. Sexual and other axis I diagnoses of 60 males arrested for crimes against children involving the Internet. CNS Spectrums. 2009;14(11):623–31. 24. Berson IR. Grooming cybervictims: The psychosocial effects of online exploitation for youth. J Sch Violence. 2003;2:5–18. 25. McAlinden AM. “Setting ‘em up”: Personal, familial and institutional grooming in the sexual abuse of children. Social and Legal Studies. 2006;15:339–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663906066613 26. Gillespie A. Child protection on the internet: Challenges for criminal law. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2002;14:411–26. 27. Fromberger P, Jordan K, Müller JL. Pädophilie: Ätiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. Nervenarzt. 2013:1123–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-013-3805-9 28. Wolak J. Child pornography possessors: Trends in offender and case characteristics. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2011;23(1):22–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210372143 29. Long ML, Alison LA, McManus MA. Child pornography and likelihood of contact abuse: A comparison between contact child sexual offenders and noncontact offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2013;25:370–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212464398 30. Briggs P, Simon WT, Simonsen S. An Exploratory Study of Internet-Initiated Sexual Offenses and the Chat Room Sex Offender: Has the Internet Enabled a New Typology of Sex Offender? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2010;23(1):72–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384275 31. Laulik S, Allam J, Sheridan L. An investigation into maladaptive personality functioning in Internet sex offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law. 2007;13:523–35. 32. Seto MC, Hanson RK, Babchishin KM. Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment. 2011;23:124–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210369013 33. Kerry S, Dennis H. Sexual fantasy in paedophile offenders: Can any model explain satisfactorily new findings from a study of Internet and contact sexual offenders? Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2008;13:137–58. 34. Delmonico DL, Griffin E, Carnes PJ. Treating online compulsive sexual behaviour: when cybersex is the drug of choice. In: A Cooper (ed.). Sex and the internet. N.Y.: Brunner-Routlege; 2002. p. 147–67. 35. Pfäfflin F. Sexual straftaten. In: K Foerster, U Venzlaff (Hrsg.). Psychiatrische Begutachtung. Urban & Fischer. München; 2004. p. 275–302. 36. Pawel T, Marieke L, Weijs H, Henrik E. Perception of Our Own Body Influences SelfConcept and Self-Incoherence Impairs Episodic Memory. iScience 23. 2020;23(9):101429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101429 37. Riva G, Mantovani F, Capideville CS, et al. Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior. 2007;10(1):45–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993PMID:17305448 38. Bandura A. Sociul learning theory. Englewood Cliffs; N.J.: Prentice Hall; 1977. 247 p. 39. Durkin KF, Bryant CD. Propagandizing pederasty: A thematic analysis of the on-line exculpatory accounts of unrepentant pedophiles. Deviant Behaviour: An Interdisciplinury Journal. 1999;20:103–27. 40. Hanson RK, Gizzarelli R, Scott H. The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice und Behaviour. 1994;21:187–202. 41. Langton CM, Marshall WL. The role of cognitive distortions in relapse prevention programs. In: DR Laws, SM Hudson, T Ward (eds). Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage; 2000. p. 167–86. 42. Murphy WD. Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. In: WL Marshall, DR Laws, HE Barbaree (eds). Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. N.Y.: Plenum Press; 1990. 405 p. 43. Long ML, Alison LA, McManus MA. Child pornography and likelihood of contact abuse: A comparison between contact child sexual offenders and noncontact offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2012;25(4):370–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212464398 44. Ward T, Hudson SM. A self-regulation model of relapse prevention. In: DR Laws, SM Hudson, T Ward (eds). Retnakbig relapse prevention with sex ofenders. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage; 2000. p. 79–101. 45. Borkenau P, Zaltauskas K. Effects of self-enhancement on agreement on personality profiles. Eur J Pers. 2009;23:107–23. 46. Massau C, Tenbergen G, Kargel C, et al. Executive Functioning in Pedophilia and Child Sexual Offending. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017;23(6):460–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617717000315 47. Clevenger SL, Navarro JN, Jasinski JL. A matter of low self-control? Exploring differences between child pornography possessors and child pornography producers/distributers using self-control theory. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2016;28(6):555–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214557173 48. Elliott IA, Beech AR, Mandeville-Norden R, Hayes E. Psychological profiles of Internet sexual offenders: Comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment. 2009;21:76–92.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2021-10508
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM