Обследование лиц с проблемными сексуальными интересами: канадский опыт
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Мэрфи Л., Федоров П. Обследование лиц с проблемными сексуальными интересами: канадский опыт // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2017. №5. С. 73-79.
В статье представлен общий обзор деятельности Клиники полового поведения Королевского оттавского центра психического здоровья и исследований, проводимых в экспертной лаборатории. Приводится описание методов клинического обследования, включая измерение полового возбуждения с использованием пенильной плетизмографии. Обсуждаются инновационные методы обследования, используемые в лаборатории, планы проведения клинических исследований, а также международного сотрудничества.
Ключевые слова paraphilias; sexual behaviours; assessment; plethysmography
1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Gold Award: Improving Community Safety by Providing Treatment to a Highly Marginalized Clinical Population. Psychiatric Services. 2015;66(10):1– 4. 2. Fedoroff JP, Kuban M & Bradford JM. Laboratory measurement of penile response in the assessment of sexual interests. In: Saleh F, et al. (Eds). Sex offenders: Identification, risk assessment, treatment and legal issues. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009;89–100. 3. Marshall WL. Phallometric assessments of sexual interests: an update. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2014;16(1):428–34. 4. Murphy L, Ranger R, Fedoroff JP, et al. Standardization in the use of penile plethysmography testing in assessment of problematic sexual interests. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2015;12(9):1853-61. 5. Murphy L, Ranger R, Stewart H., et al. Assessment of problematic sexual interests with the penile plethysmograph: An overview of assessment laboratories. Current Psychiatry Reports.2015;17(29). doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0567-z. 6. Müller K, Curry S, Ranger R, et al. Changes in sexual arousal as measured by penile plethysmography in men with pedophilic sexual interest. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(5):1221–9. 7. Ranger R, Murphy L, Dwyer RG, et al. Assessment Protocols for Sex Offenders. In: American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law annual meeting, A Workshop: Panel presentation. Chicago, Illinois, United States, 2014. 8. Murphy L, Ranger R, Fedoroff JP, et al. Real Child Voices: The impact of age and gender congruent voices on sexual arousal to child sexual scenarios. In: International Association of Sex Research annual meeting, Poster session. Malmo, Sweden, 2016. 9. Murphy L, Ranger R, Fedoroff JP, et al. Real Child Voices: Preliminary results on the use of age and gender congruent voices on sexual arousal to child sexual scenarios. In: International Association of Sex Research annual meeting, Poster session. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015. 10. Dwyer RG, Fedoroff JP, Murphy L, et al. PPG and fMRI: New Insights or Alphabet Soup? Panel presentation. International Association of Sex Research annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. August, 2015. 11. Dwyer RG, Fedoroff JP, Murphy L, et al. Simultaneous fMRI & PPG: Differentiating Arousal in Men with and Without Pedophilia. In: International Association of Sex Research annual meeting, Poster session. Malmo, Sweden. June 2016. 12. Knott V, Impey D, Fisher D, et al. Pedophilic brain potential responses to adult erotic stimuli. Brain Research. 2016;1632(1):127-40. PMID: 26683083. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.12.004 13. Ranger R, Murphy L, Fedoroff JP, et al. Differences in Assessment between Admitter and Denier Sex Offenders. In: International Association of Sex Research annual meeting, Poster session. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. August, 2015. 14. Knack N, Murphy L, Ranger R, et al. Assessment of female sexual arousal in forensic populations. Current Psychiatry Reports. 2015;7(4):557. PMID: 25749745. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0557-1
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM