Изучение психоэндокринных, психофизиологических и психологических коррелятов рискованного поведения и принятия рискованных решений

Полный текст:   Только для подписчиков

Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:

Лысенко Н.Е., Проничева М.М., Пеева О.Д., Булыгина В.Г. Изучение психоэндокринных, психофизиологических и психологических коррелятов рискованного поведения и принятия рискованных решений // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2023. №4. С. 91-102.

Аннотация

В научном обзоре с целью обобщения данных рассмотрены современные исследования психоэндокринных, психофизиологических и психологических коррелятов рискованного поведения и принятия рискованных решений. На основании анализа 91 статьи показаны подходы к изучению принятия решений в рамках различных научных дисциплин, представления о механизмах принятия решений в рискованных ситуациях, нейрофизиологические исследования принятия решений, а также данные о психоэндокринных коррелятах рискованного поведения. Выводы методологических и эмпирических работ, посвященных данной проблематике, свидетельствуют, что наметившийся прогресс в этой области связан с растущим числом нейрофизиологических исследований принятия решений. Уязвимым для критики является подход принятия решений исходя из оптимальной стратегии, когда влияние лица, принимающего решения, остается вне фокуса исследователей. Для расширения представлений о механизмах принятия рискованных решений представляется важным развитие междисциплинарного подхода, включающего анализ нейрональных основ морального выбора как одной из детерминант процесса принятия решений.

Ключевые слова принятие решений; психоэндокринные и психофизиологические корреляты рискованного поведения; психологические факторы рискованного поведения

Литература

1. Vlasova GI, Neshin MA, Vlasov AS. [Features of maintaining stress resistance and psychophysiological professional training of Russian Emergency Situations Ministry specialists working in special conditions]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo voyennogo instituta voysk natsional'noy gvardii [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Military Institute of National Guard Troops]. 2020;2(11):55–61. (In Russ.) 2. Strel'nikova YuYu. [Types of psychological and somatic consequences that arise among employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia in the process of professional activity]. Vestnik JuUrGU. Serija “Psikhologiya”. 2016;9(1):55–63. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529^у160106 3. Bogdasarov YuV, Ichitovkina YeG, Solov'yev AG. [General and primary incidence of mental disorders in persons observed in medical institutions of internal affairs bodies]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2020;120(6):99–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012006199 4. Alink LR, Cicchetti D, Kim J, Rogosch FA. Longitudinal associations among child maltreatment, social functioning, and cortisol regulation. Dev Psychol. 2012;48(1):224–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024892 5. Fanti KA. Understanding heterogeneity in conduct disorder: A review of psychophysiological studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;91:4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.022 6. Schwabe L, Höffken O, Tegenthoff M, Wolf OT. Stress-induced enhancement of response inhibition depends on mineralocorticoid receptor activation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(10):2319–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.001 7. Taber CS, Lodge M. The illusion of choice in democratic politics: the unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Polit Psychol. 2016;37(S1):61–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12321 8. Terburg D, Morgan B, van Honk J. The testosterone-cortisol ratio: A hormonal marker for proneness to social aggression. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(4):216–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.008 9. Karpov AV, Bashaeva TV, Koneva EV, et al. Psihologiya truda: uchebnik i praktikum dlja vuzov / AV Karpov, editor. Moscow: Jurajt; 2022. 364 p. (In Russ.) 10. Dolyatovskij VA. [Ergonomic tasks of modern management]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental research]. 2022;(9):12–9. (In Russ.) 11. Solnceva GN. [Conditions and situations of professional activity – types and perspectives of changes]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin]. Seriya 14. Psihologiya. 2021;(2):74–100. (In Russ.) 12. Pavlova EM, Kornilova TV, Krasavceva YUV, Bogacheva NV. Lichnostnyj profil' i reguljacija prinjatija reshenij licami medicinskih special'nostej: ot studenta do praktikujushhego vracha. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psihologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie”. 2019;(2):97–115. (In Russ.) 13. Kornilova TV. Lichnostnye osnovaniya prinyatiya reshenij o social'nom distancirovanii v trekh stranah (Rossiya, Azerbajdzhan i Kitaj). In: Novye vyzovy neopredelennosti: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Novosibirsk; 2020. p. 46–9. (In Russ.) 14. Il'in EP. Psihologiya voli. 2-e izd. Saint Petersburg; 2021. 592 p. (In Russ.) 15. Kardanskaya NL. Prinyatie upravlencheskogo resheniya. Moscow; 2017. 407 p. (In Russ.) 16. Kornilova TV. [Latent profiles of personality and decision-making regulation styles]. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy]. 2022;30(2):126–45. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300208 17. Kozeleckij YU. Psihologicheskaya teoriya reshenij. Per. s pol'sk. GE Minca,VN Porusa; VV Birjukova, editor. Moscow: Progress; 1979. 504 p. (In Russ.) 18. Lysakov ND. Psihologiya prinyatiya resheniya na polet v slozhnyh meteorologicheskih usloviyah. CHelovecheskij kapital. 2022;2(158):68–74. (In Russ.) 19. Aldasheva AA, Lim VS, Lekalov AA, Runec OV. Sovladanie s neopredelennost'ju i slozhnost'ju letchikami VKS. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya Truda. 2021;6(3):100–17. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp_2021_20_3_005 20. Voronov AI, Chigoryaev EA, Krestyaninov VA. Prinjatie reshenija sotrudnikom policii po primeneniju sredstv prinuzhdenija. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh. 2019;24(4(79):410–6. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-6241-2019-14009 21. Waring S, Moran JL, Page R. Decision‐making in multiagency multiteam systems operating in extreme environments. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2020;93(1):629–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12309 22. Razuvaeva TN, Savickij AV. Prinjatie riskovannyh reshenij v zadachah, zadannyh posredstvom interaktivnyh medijnyh sredstv. Izvestiya YUgo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Lingvistika i pedagogika. 2019;3(32):176–85. (In Russ.) 23. Rubahin VF. “Iskusstvennyj intellect” i prinjatie reshenij. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda. 2021;6(3):247–55. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp_2021_20_3_011 24. Lebedev AN. Kvazijeksperimental'noe issledovanie prinjatija reshenij v uslovijah ravnoznachnogo vybora. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2018;11(4):79–93. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110407 25. Kuznecov OP. Ogranichennaja racional'nost' i prinjatie reshenij. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinyatie reshenij. 2019;(1):3–15. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14357/20718594190101 26. Kornilova TV, CHumakova MA. Shkaly tolerantnosti i intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikacii oprosnika S. Badnera. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2014;7(1):92–110. (In Russ.) 27. Falikman MV, Pechenkova EV. Principy fiziologii aktivnosti N.A. Bernshtejna v psihologii vosprijatija i vnimanija: problemy i perspektivy. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2016;12(4):48–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120405 28. Gurvich IN, Cvetkova LA, Antonova NA, Ericyan KYU. Konceptualizacija povedenija riska s pozicij psihologicheskoj nauki. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija “Sociologija”. 2014;(3):113–20. (In Russ.) 29. Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. [The problem of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(3):56–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957H-2021-10306 30. Rogacheva TV, Zalevskij GV, Levickaya TE. Psihologiya ekstremal'nyh situacij i sostoyanij: Uchebn. posobie. Tomsk: Izd. dom TGU; 2015. 276 p. (In Russ.) 31. Epel ES, Crosswell AD, Mayer SE, et al. More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2018;49:146–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 32. Baumgartner JN, Schneider TR. Personality and stress. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 3699–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_2115 33. Vodop'yanova NE, Starchenkova ES. Sub"ektivnye reprezentacii organizacionnoj kul'tury i dinamiki razvitiya psihologicheskogo stressa. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2008;12(4):356–62. (In Russ.) 34. Bergis TA. Psihologiya stressa: praktikum. Tol'yatti: Tol'jattinskij gos. un-t; 2019. 112 p. (In Russ.) 35. Métais C, Burel N, Gillham JE, et al. Integrative Review of the Recent Literature on Human Resilience: From Concepts, Theories, and Discussions Towards a Complex Understanding. Eur J Psychol. 2022;18(1):98–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2251 36. Zhu R, Lin J, Becerik-Gerber B, Li N. Human-building-emergency interactions and their impact on emergency response performance: A review of the state of the art. Safety Science. 2020;127:104691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104691 37. Nguyen HD, Choi M, Han K. Risk-informed decision-making and control strategies for autonomous vehicles in emergency situations. Accid Anal Prev. 2023;193:107305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107305 38. Medvedeva TI, Bolshakova SP, Zinchenko OO, Enikolopova EV. [The emotional decision-making in the situations of uncertainty]. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological studies]. 2015;8(43):10. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i43.524 39. Savickij AV. Lichnostnye osobennosti prinyatiya riskovannyh reshenij v interaktivnoj cifrovoj srede [PhD thesis]. [Sankt-Peterburg (Russia)]: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University named after. 2020. 28 p. (In Russ.) 40. Bruria A, Maya S-T, Gadi S, Orna T. Impact of emergency situations on resilience at work and burnout of Hospital's healthcare personnel. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;76(1):102994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102994 41. Lin J, Li N, Rao L-L, Lovreglio R. Individual wayfinding decisions under stress in indoor emergency situations: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Safety Science. 2023;160(5):106063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106063 42. Prell R, Starcke K. Adding fuel to the fire: The impact of stress on decision-making in dilemmas among emergency service personnel. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 2023;73(4):100872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2023.100872 43. Doncov AI. Psihologiya bezopasnosti. Moscow: Jurajt; 2018. 276 p. (In Russ.) 44. Weber EU. Risk attitude and preference. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010;1(1):79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.5 45. Duffee B, Willis DB. Paramedic perspectives of job stress: Qualitative analysis of high-stress, high-stakes emergency medical situations. Soc Sci Med. 2023;333:116177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116177 46. Sohn W, Kotval-Karamchandani Z. Risk perception of compound emergencies: A household survey on flood evacuation and sheltering behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Cities Soc. 2023;94:104553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104553 47. Abdin SZ, Qureshi F, Iqbal J, Sultana S. Overconfidence bias and investment performance: A mediating effect of risk propensity. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22:780–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.03.001 48. Niazashvili AG. Individual'nye razlichiya sklonnosti k risku v raznyh social'nyh situaciyah razvitiya lichnosti [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow University for the Humanities; 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.) 49. Kovaleva IA. Osobennosti gendernogo aspekta v professional'noj kar'ere In: Psihologicheskie nauki: teoriya i praktika: materialy I Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Moscow; 2012. р. 50–2. (In Russ.) 50. Gowen R, Filipowicz A, Ingram KK. Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619 51. Harlamenkova NE, Tarabrina NV, Byhovec YUV, et al. Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti: implicitnaya i eksplicitnaya koncepcii. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN; 2017. 262 p. (In Russ.) 52. Gong Z, Yang J, Gilal FG, et al. Repairing Police Psychological Safety: The Role of Career Adaptability, Feedback Environment, and Goal-Self Concordance Based on the Conservation of Resources Theory. SAGE Open. 2020;10(2):215824402091951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919510 53. Aven T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;253:1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 54. Zinn JO. The meaning of risk-taking – key concepts and dimensions. J Risk Res. 2019;22(1):1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465 55. Wei S-Y, Kuo Y-K The relationship among safety leadership, risk perception, safety culture, and safety performance: Military volunteer soldiers as a case study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1000331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1000331 56. Cheah YK, Lim HK, Kee ChCh. Personal and Family Factors Associated with High-risk Behaviours Among Adolescents in Malaysia. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;48:92–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.07.012 57. Man SS, Alabdulkarim S, Chan AHS, Zhang T. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate. J Safety Res. 2021;79:329–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014 58. Mironova YUV. Fiziologicheskoe obespechenie emocional'nogo intellekta u lic, sklonnyh k riskovannomu povedeniyu [PhD thesis]. [Volgograd (Russia)]: Volgograd State Medical University; 2017. 24 p. (In Russ.) 59. Slepko YUN. Soderzhanie ponyatiya “effektivnost' professional'noj deyatel'nosti”. YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2010;(4):193–7. (In Russ.) 60. Kubyshko VL, Kruk VM, Vahnina VV, Fedotov AYU. [On the Question of Psychological Support for Occupational Reliability of Power Structures Professionals]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2020;10(4):18–32. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100402 61. Talashmanova KA. Diagnostika professional'noj nadezhnosti sub"ekta. Innovacionnaya nauka [Innovation Science]. 2020;(5):177–83. (In Russ.) 62. Fedotov AYU. Psihologicheskoe obespechenie professional'noj nadezhnosti specialista silovyh struktur [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs; 2020. 49 p. (In Russ.) 63. Efremenko II. Nejrofiziologiya i sensornye sistemy. Vitebsk; 2022. 235 p. (In Russ.) 64. Kovaleva AV. Nejrofiziologiya. Moscow; 2019. 186 p. (In Russ.) 65. Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague P. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):545–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357 66. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10(3):295–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 67. Samolova VO, Anchugova OV, Zarifulina VD. Nejroekonomika. In: YAzyk v sfere professional'noj kommunikacii: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii prepodavatelej, aspirantov i studentov. Ekaterinburg; 2019. p. 542–7. (In Russ.) 68. Kostychev NA, Batorova EYu, Makushkin AV, Perepelov AV. Zavisimost' kozhno-gal'vanicheskoj reakcii ot emocional'nogo sostoyaniya u yunoshej i devushek. Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019;51(6):34–6. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-06-2019-130 69. Efimova MV, Muhtarova DR. Analiz pokazatelej emocional'noj napryazhennosti pri izmerenii kozhno-gal'vanicheskoj reakcii. Slovo i tekst: psiholingvisticheskij podhod. 2021;(20):93–9. (In Russ.) 70. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. Social Neuroscience: Key Readings. New York; 2005. 312 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496190 71. Enikolopov SN, Medvedeva TI, Voroncova OYU. [Moral dilemmas and personality traits]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2019;9(2):141–55. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090210 72. Bulygina VG, Isangalieva IM, Peeva OD, et al. [Current Studies of The Neuronal Foundations of Moral Decision-Making]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2023;13(2):110–26. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130209 73. Zhang D, Gu R, Broster LS, et al. Linking brain electrical signals elicited by current outcomes with future risk decision-making. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00084 74. Zhozhikashvili NA, Bakumova AD, Bochkovskaya IA. Al'fa- i teta-ritmy kak markery kognitivnogo usiliya. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal]. 2022;19(2):201–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.15 75. Zaleshin AV, Merzhanova GH. [Phase time lag between EEG rhythms in human behavior on choosing a risk-associated reward]. ZHurnal vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti im. I.P. Pavlova [Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology]. 2019;69(1):14–22. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044467719010143 76. Karatygin NA, Korobejnikova II, Venerina YAA, et al. [Spectral Characteristics of the EEG Theta-Band and Efficiency of Cognitive Test “N-Back” Performing]. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2022;15(2):95–110. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150208 77. Yapl ZA. Nejrofiziologicheskie korrelyaty prinyatiya reshenij v usloviyah riska [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: National Research University Higher School of Economics; 2019. 37 p. (In Russ.) 78. Novikova SI. [EEG rhythms and cognitive processes]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. 2015;4(1):91–108. (In Russ.) 79. Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017;8:213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213 80. Murtazina EP, Matyul'ko IS, ZHuravlev BV, Golubeva NK. [Somatoautonomic components of social interactions (review)]. ZHurnal mediko-biologicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Medical and Biological Research]. 2019;(3):349–62. (In Russ.) 81. Mkrtychyan AS, Koroleva SV. [Psychophysiological Model of Stress-Induced Cardiovascular Disorders Development Risk]. Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya [Psychology. Psychophysiology]. 2019;(3):83–92. (In Russ.) 82. Pavlov KI, Petrenko MI, Muhin VN, et al. [Psychophysiological predictors of military-occupational adaptation of first-year cadets of a naval institute]. Psihologiya obrazovaniya v polikul'turnom prostranstve [Psychology of education in a multicultural space]. 2021;(1):18–36. (In Russ.) 83. Kubasov RV. [Hormonal Changes in Response to Extreme Environment Factors]. Vestnik RAMN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences]. 2014;9–10:102–9. (In Russ.) 84. Ribeiro SC. Interface of physical and emotional stress regulation through the endogenous opioid system and mu-opioid receptors. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005;29(8):1264–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.011 85. Lam JCW, Shields GS, Trainor BC, et al. Greater lifetime stress exposure predicts blunted cortisol but heightened DHEA responses to acute stress. Stress Health. 2019;35(1):15–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2835 86. Kochetkov YaA. Markery gormonal'nogo balansa pri depressivnyh rasstrojstvah [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow State University; 2009. 23 p. (In Russ.) 87. Hadzhieva NH. Struktura, diagnostika i lechenie stress-zavisimyh narushenij menstrual'nogo cikla [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; 2021. 22 p. (In Russ.) 88. Fries E, Dettenborn L, Kirschbaum C. The cortisol awakening response (CAR): facts and future directions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;72(1):67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.014 89. Stephens MA, Mahon PB, McCaul ME, Wand GS. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress: Effects of biological sex and circulating sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;66:47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.12.021 90. Schindler L, Shaheen M, Saar-Ashkenazy R, et al. Victims of War: Dehydroepiandrosterone Concentrations in Hair and Their Associations with Trauma Sequelae in Palestinian Adolescents Living in the West Bank. Brain Sci. 2019;9(2):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020020 91. Hennessey EP, Kepinska O, Haft SL, et al. Hair cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations: Associations with executive function in early childhood. Biol Psychol. 2020;155:107946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107946



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34757/1560-957X.2023.27.4.010

Метрики статей

Загрузка метрик ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM