Диагностическое значение трекинга глаз в сексологии
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Каменсков М.Ю., Введенский Г.Е., Купцова Д.М., Демидова Л.Ю. Диагностическое значение трекинга глаз в сексологии // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2018. №1. С. 78-85.
В статье представлен аналитический обзор по применению высокоскоростных методов оценки трекинга глаз в сексологии. Существующий на сегодняшний день инструментарий позволяет оценивать 4 основных физиологических процесса, характеризующих восприятие эротической информации: саккады, фиксации, моргание и диаметр зрачка. Большая часть работ в этой области сосредоточена на изучении влияния гендерных особенностей на перцепцию сексуальных стимулов, меньшая доля рассматривает трекинг глаз как метод диагностики парафильных расстройств. Система отслеживания движения глаз представляет собой многообещающий и перспективный подход к оценке сексуального интереса в рамках гендерных и клинических исследований.
Ключевые слова трекинг глаз, фиксации, саккады, зрачок, моргание, диагностика парафилий
1. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(6):1154–63. 2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. American Psychiatric Pub. 2000: 980 p. 3. Delabarre EB. A method of recording eye-movements. Am J Psychol 1898;9(5):572–74. 4. Barabanshikov VA, Zhegalo AV. Registratsiya i analiz napravlennosti vzora cheloveka [Registration and Orientation Analysis of the Human Eye]. Moscow. 2013. 316 p. Russian. 5. Fromberger P, Jordan K, von Herder J, Steinkrauss H, Nemetschek R, Stolpmann G, Mller JL. Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(4):919–28. 6. Nummenmaa L, Hyona J, Calvo MG. Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. J. Emotion. 2006;6(2):257–68. 7. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50(6):243–71. 8. Nummenmaa L, Hietanen JK, Santtila P, Hyna J. Gender and visibility of sexual cues influence eye movements while viewing faces and bodies. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(5):1439–51. 9. Gillath O, Bahns AJ, Burghart HA. Eye Movements When Looking at Potential Friends and Romantic Partners. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(8):2313-25. 10. Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Linklater WL, Dixson AF. Eye-tracking of men's preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40(1): 43–50. 11. Chivers ML. A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2010;25(4):407–414. 12. Suschinsky KD, Elias LJ, Krupp DB. Looking for Ms. Right: Allocating attention to facilitate mate choice decisions. Evol Psychol. 2007;5(2): 428–41. 13. Cornelissen PL, Hancock PJ, Kiviniemi V, George HR, Tovee MJ. Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat, and waist-to-hip ratio. Evol and Hum Behav. 2009;30(6):417–28. 14. Cornelissen PL, Tovee MJ, & Bateson M. Patterns of subcutaneous fat deposition and the relationship between body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: Implications for models of physical attractiveness. J Theor Biol. 2009;256(3):343–50. 15. Fromberger P, Jordan K, von Herder J, Steinkrauss H, Nemetschek R, Stolpmann G, Mller JL. Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Arch Sex Behav, 2012;41(4): 919–28. 16. Spiering M, Everaerd W. The sexual unconscious. In: Ed. Janssen E. The psychophysiol sex. Indiana University Press; 2007. p. 166–84. 17. Bolmont M, Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. Love is in the gaze: An eye-tracking study of love and sexual desire. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(9):1748–56. PMID: 25031302 DOI:10.1177/0956797614539706 18. Little AC, Connely J, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Roberts SC. Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behavioral Ecology. 2011;22(4):862–68. 19. Hall C, Hogue T, Guo K. Sexual cognition guides viewing strategies to human figures. J. Sex Res. 2014;51(2):184–96. 20. Tsujimura A, Miyagawa Y, Takada S, Nagahara A, Matsuoka Y, Takao T, Okuyama A. The relation between sexual interest and personality characteristics in men: An eye-tracking study. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22:185–9. DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2009.61 21. Renaud P, Proulx J, Rouleau JL, Bouchard S, Madrigrano G, Bradford J, Fedoroff P. The recording of observational behaviors in virtual immersion: A new research and clinical tool to address the problem of sexual preferences with paraphiliacs. Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine. 2005;3:85–93. 22. Jordan K, Fromberger P, von Herder J, Steinkrauss H, Nemetschek R, Mller, Impaired Attentional Control in Pedophiles in a Sexual Distractor Task. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7: 193. 23. Fromberger P, Jordan K, Steinkrauss H, von Herder J, Stolpmann G, Krner-Herwig B, Mller JL. Eye movements in pedophiles: Automatic and controlled attentional processes while viewing prepubescent stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(2):587–99. 24. Makarov IA. Sposob pupillografii. Patent RF. No RU2197169C2. 2003;(16). Russian. 25. Kreydelin GYe. Neverbal'naya semiotika: Yazyk tela i yestestvennyy yazyk. Moscow, 2004. 584 p. Russian. 26. Rieger G, Cash BM, Merrill SM, Jones-Rounds J, Dharmavaram SM, Savin-Williams RC. Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biol Psychol Bull. 2015;104:56–64. 27. Laeng B, Sirois S, Gredeback G. Pupillometry: A window to the preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(1):18–27. 28. Chivers ML. A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal. Sex Relation Ther. 2010;25(4): 407–14. 29. Bradley MM, Miccoli L, Escrig MA, Lang PJ. The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. J Psychophysiol, 2008;45(4):602–7. 30. Cheval B, Grob E, Chanal J, Ghisletta P, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Radel R. Homophobia is related to a low interest in sexuality in general: An analysis of pupillometric evoked responses. J Sex Med. 2016:13(10): 1539–45. 31. Aboyoun DC, Dabbs JM. The Hess pupil dilation findings: Sex or novelty? Social Behavior and Personality. J Soc Behav Pers. 1998;26(4):415–19. 32. Dabbs JM. Jr . Testosterone and pupillary response to auditory sexual stimuli. Physiol Behav. 1997;62(4):909–12. 33. Rieger G, Cash BM, Merrill SM, Jones-Rounds J, Dharmavaram SM, Savin-Williams RC. Sexual arousal: The correspondence of eyes and genitals. Biol Psychol Bull. 2015;104:56–64. 34. Bertrand AL, Garcia JB, Viera EB, Santos AM, Bertrand RH. Pupillometry: the influence of gender and anxiety on the pain response. Pain Physician. 2013;16(3):257–66. PMID: 23703424 35. Hecker JE, King MW, Scoular RJ editors. Startle eye-blink: Preliminary support for a promising method of measuring sexual interest. In cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders. Symposium of American Psychology-Law Society conference; 2006; St. Petersberg: Chair (USA); 2006. 36. Hecker JE., King MW, Scoular RJ. The Startle Probe Reflex: An Alternative Approach to the Measurement of Sexual Interest. In: Eds. Thornton D, Laws D.R. Cognitive Approaches to the Assessment of Sexual Interest in Sexual Offenders. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. 37. Akerman G, Beech AR. A Systematic Review of Measures of Deviant Sexual Interest and Arousal. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2012;19(1):118–43. 38. Kirenskaya AV, Myamlin VV, Kamenskov M.Yu, et al. [Research frontal dysfunction in patients with paraphilia]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2007; (6): 33–40. Russian. 39. Kirenskaya AV, Tkachenko AA, Kamenskov M.Yu, et al. [Neurophysiological mechanisms of fixed forms of abnormal sexual behavior]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2010;(1):53–62. Russian. 40. Oberlader VA, Ettinger U, Banse R, Schmidt AF. Development of a Cued Pro- and Antisaccade Paradigm: An Indirect Measure to Explore Automatic Components of Sexual Interest. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(8): 2377–88.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2018-1%25x
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM