Principles of clinical-psychological forensic expert science
Suggested citation:
Safuanov FS. [Principles of clinical-psychological forensic expert science]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(2):39-45. Russian
In this scientific review, pursuing the objective of analysis, we consider the main principles of the clinical-psychological forensic expert science. The principle of comparative expert studies explains how fundamental sciences are transformed into the system of specialist knowledge in the field of forensic science. The principle of dialectical unity of integration and differentiation of forensic expert sciences is exercised through the study of the legal criteria, jointly carried out by psychiatrists and psychologists, and through delimitation of psychopathological or psychological factors which affect the legally significant capacities of forensic examinees. The principle of ratifiability determines the practical interaction of experts with the agencies which order forensic assessments. We have identified the regular pattern of the multi-subject interdisciplinary formation of specialist psychological knowledge within the framework of forensic examination.
Keywords forensic expert science; combined psychological and psychiatric assessment; experts' specialized knowledge
1. Mahov VN. Ispol'zovanie znanij svedushchih lic pri rassledovanii prestuplenij. Moscow: Izd-vo RUDN; 2000. 296 p. Russian. 2. Nesterov AV. O sootnoshenii ponyatij special'nyh znanij i poznanij eksperta. Ekspert-kriminalist. 2010;(1):11–3. Russian. 3. Vinberg AI, Malahovskaya NT. Sudebnaya ekspertologiya. Volgograd: Izd-vo VSSH MVD SSSR; 1979. 183 p. Russian. 4. Safuanov FS. Ob osnovnyh kategoriyah sudebno-psihologicheskoj ekspertizy v ugolovnom processe. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1994;(3):51–4. Russian. 5. Obzor sudebnoj praktiki Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii N 4 (2015) (utv. Prezidiumom Verhovnogo Suda RF 23.12.2015). https://sudact.ru/law/obzor-sudebnoi-praktiki-verkhovnogo-suda-rossiiskoi-federatsii_11/ Russian. 6. Kochenov MM. Teoreticheskie osnovy sudebno-psihologicheskoj ekspertizy [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Akad. MVD SSSR [Acad. of the MIA of the USSR]; 1991. 44 p. Russian. 7. Haritonova NK, Safuanov FS, Malkin DA. Ekspertnaya ocenka sdelkosposobnosti po grazhdanskim delam v ramkah kompleksnoj sudebnoj psihologo-psihiatricheskoj ekspertizy: Posobie dlya vrachej. Moscow: GNC SSP im VP Serbskogo; 2005. 30 p. Russian. 8. Safuanov FS, Savina OF, Morozova MV, Isaeva IV. Kriterii sudebno-psihologicheskoj ekspertnoj ocenki yuridicheski relevantnyh emocional'nyh sostoyanij u obvinyaemyh: metod. rekomendacii. Moscow: FGBU “FMICPN im. VP Serbskogo” Minzdrava Rossii; 2016. 28 p. Russian. 9. Polozhenie o proizvodstve kompleksnoj sudebnoj psihologo-psihiatricheskoj ekspertizy v Gosudarstvennom nauchnom centre social'noj i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. VP Serbskogo. Pod red. TB Dmitrievoj. Moscow: GNC SSP im. VP Serbskogo; 1998. 8 p. Russian. 10. Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii. Prikaz ot 12 avgusta 2003 goda N 401 “Ob utverzhdenii otraslevoj uchetnoj i otchetnoj medicinskoj dokumentacii po sudebno-psihiatricheskoj ekspertize”. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901874231 Russian. 11. Safuanov FS. Sudebno-psihologicheskaya ekspertiza: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. Moscow: Yurajt; 2014. 421 p. Russian. 12. Habermas J. Theory and practice. London; 1974. 310 p. 13. Naznachenie sudebno-psihiatricheskoj ekspertizy po ugolovnym delam (vybor vida naznachaemoj ekspertizy i formulirovanie ekspertnogo zadaniya): Prakticheskoe posobie. Moscow: FGBU “NMIC PN im. VP Serbskogo”; 2020. 45 p. Russian. 14. Safuanov FS, Isaeva IV. Analiz reshenij verhovnyh sudov po affektivnym prestupleniyam i problemy sudebnoj ekspertizy. Rossijskij sud'ya. 2015;(12):37–40. Russian.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2020-1%25x
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM