Readiness to substance use-related behavior change and its relationship with psycho-emotional condition and personal features in patients with substance-related disorders: results of a pilot study
Suggested citation:
Fadeeva EV, Lanovaya AM. [Readiness to substance use-related behavior change and its relationship with psycho-emotional condition and personal features in patients with substance-related disorders: results of a pilot study]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2023;(1):33-42. Russian
A pilot study was conducted to investigate the readiness for behavioral change and its correlation with the psychosocial state among 40 patients (30 men and 10 women) with substance use disorders (F10.x, F11.x, F19.x, ICD-10). The study included an assessment of motivational counseling results and standardized psychometric measures (SOCRATES; DASS-2; GSE) at the initial and final stages of inpatient treatment, as well as during medical rehabilitation, which allowed analyzing the characteristics of interest over time. The novelty of the proposed clinical approach lies in considering the dynamics of motivational characteristics and psychosocial status of patients with substance use disorders, which in the future will improve the quality of specialized addiction treatment and the development of personalized treatment and medical rehabilitation programs.
Keywords substance use behavior; alcohol; drugs; motivational intervention
1. Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Assessing drinkers’ motivations for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychol Addict Behav. 1996;10(2):81–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.10.2.81 2. Prochaska D, Norcross D, di Clemente K. [Changing for Good: A Revolutionary Six-Stage Program for Overcoming Bad Habits and Moving Your Life]. Per. s angl. M Puksant. Moscow; 2013. 320 р. (In Russ.) 3. Melnick G, Hawke J, De Leon G. Motivation and readiness for drug treatment: differences by modality and special populations. J Addict Dis. 2014;33(2):134–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2014.909700 4. Tiu MMH, Fung CKM, Fung WY, et al. Experience of Drug Abusers Participating in Community-Based Drug Rehabilitation Services Provided by the Counselling Centres for Psychotropic Substance Abusers (CCPSAs) in Hong Kong. Health. 2020;(12):1008–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2020.128075 5. Tracy K, Wallace S. Benefits of Peer Support Groups in the Treatment of Addiction. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2006;7:143–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S81535 6. Peterson P, Baer J, Wells E, et al. Short-Term Effects of a Brief Motivational Intervention to Reduce Alcohol and Drug Risk among Homeless Adolescents. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(3):254–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.20.3.254 7. Lei H, Yuan Y, Wang Z, et al. Measurement Invariance and Intergenerational Parallelism of General Self-Efficacy in Adolescent and Parent Dyads. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01251 8. Lazi M, Jovanovi V. The general self-efficacy scale: new evidence of structural validity, measurement invariance, and predictive properties in relationship to subjective well-being in Serbian samples. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:699–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9992-6 9. Mey S, Khairudin R, Muda T, et al. The Mediating Role of Forgiveness and Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Childhood Maltreatment and Treatment Motivation Among Malaysian Male Drug Addicts. Front Psychol. 2022;13:816373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816373 10. Lutova NB, Vid VD, Sorokin MYU, Makarevich OV. Motivacionnoe interv'yu dlya uluchsheniya medikamentoznogo komplaensa u bol'nyh s psihicheskimi rasstrojstvami: metodicheskie rekomendacii. SPb.: NMIC PN im. V.M. Bekhtereva; 2018. 22 р. (In Russ.) 11. Gromyko DI, Nechaeva AI, Erofeeva NA, et al. [The study of sociodemographic, clinical and psychoemotional characteristics in motivation for treatment in patients with stimulant use disorder]. Narkologiya [Narcology]. 2022;21(10):16–30. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25557/1682-8313.2022.10 12. Gromyko DI, Nechaeva AI, Erofeeva NA, et al. [The study of sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and psychoemotional characteristics in motivation for treatment in patients with opioid use disorder]. Narkologiya [Narcology]. 2021;20(11):12–23. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25557/1682-8313.2021.11.12-23 13. Gromyko DI, Ilyuk RD, Kiselev AS. [Clinical and psychological indicators affecting treatment motivation in patients with opioid and stimulant dependence]. Voprosy narkologii [Journal of addiction problems]. 2019;179(8):71–2. (In Russ.) 14. Klimanova SG, Trusova AV, Kiselev AS, et al. [Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Russian Version of the Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES)]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy]. 2018;26(3):80–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2018260305 15. Ruzhenkova VV, Ruzhenkov VA. [Russian adaptation of the dass-21 for screening and diagnosis of depression, anxiety and stress]. Vestnik psihiatrii, nevrologii i nejrohirurgii [Bulletin of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery]. 2019;(10):39–46. (In Russ.) 16. Zolotareva AA. [Systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21)]. Obozrenie psihiatrii i medicinskoj psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva [V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology]. 2020;(2):26–37. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-26-37 17. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales. 2nd Ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995. 42 p. 18. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Optimistic self-beliefs as a resource factor in coping with stress. Extreme Stress Commun. 1995;80:159–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8486-9_7 19. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. The general self-efficacy scale (GSE). Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;(12):329–45. 20. Sheina AYU, Shumilov NS. [Review of modern goal-setting tools]. Innovacionnye nauchnye issledovaniya [Innovative scientific research]. 2022;20(6– 2):158–68. (In Russ.) 21. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Helping People Change. Per. s angl. JuM Susoevoĭ, DM Vershininoj. Moscow; 2021. 544 р. (In Russ.) 22. Psihicheskie i povedencheskie rasstrojstva, vyzvannye upotrebleniem psihoaktivnyh veshchestv. Pagubnoe (s vrednymi posledstviyami) upotreblenie. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Associaciya narkologov Rossii. God utverzhdeniya; 2020. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/592_1 (accessed on: 22.08.2022). (In Russ.) 23. Shustov AD, Klimenko TV. [Study of the effectiveness of provital therapeutic interview using SOCRATES method]. Voprosy narkologii [Journal of addiction problems]. 2019;182(11):65–71. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47877/0234-0623_2019_11_65 24. Agibalova TV, Orlova AV. Primenenie motivacionnogo interv'yu v lechenii pacientov so zlokachestvennymi techeniem alkogol'noj zavisimosti. Interdisciplinarnyj podhod k komorbidnosti psihicheskih rasstrojstv na puti k integrativnomu lecheniyu: Sbornik tezisov. Pod obshh. red. NG Neznanova. SPb.; 2021. p. 1723–5. (In Russ.) 25. Kravchenko SL. Obshhaya psixopatologiya narkologicheskix zabolevanij. In: Affektivny`e sindromy`. Narkologiya. Nacional`noe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie. NN Ivanecz, MA Vinnikova, editors. Moscow: GE`OTAR-Media; 2020. р. 87–90. (In Russ.) 26. Al`tshuler VB, Kravchenko SL. Obshhaya psixopatologiya narkologicheskix zabolevanij. Affektivny`e sindromy`. In: Narkologiya: Nacional`noe rukovodstvo. NN Ivanecz, IP Anohinа, MA Vinnikova, editors. Moscow: GE`OTAR-Media; 2016. р. 278–83. (In Russ.)
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM