Preliminary adaptation and validation of psychometric methods for the dimensional assessment of personality disorders as part of the transition to the ICD-11
Suggested citation:
Samylkin DV, Demidova LYu, Gadisov TG, et al. [Preliminary adaptation and validation of psychometric methods for the dimensional assessment of personality disorders as part of the transition to the ICD-11]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2023;(1):51-59. Russian
In a one-stage retrospective study with the aim of preliminary adaptation of the methods of The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (FFiCD) and The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS), a pilot test was conducted on the Russian-speaking audience, in which 58 male subjects (age 36.1±11.7 years), divided into 3 groups, took part – mentally healthy volunteers (19 people), persons with personality disorders (27 people) and persons with schizophrenic spectrum disorders (12 people). Based on the results of the pilot testing, it was concluded that the Russian-language versions of the FFICD and SIFS scales are suitable for use in clinical practice. The texts of the questionnaires turned out to be understandable to the subjects and the persons who conducted the testing. Preliminary results suggest that the SIFS and FFICD scales have diagnostic value and are informative in the diagnosis of personality disorders.
Keywords personality disorder; ICD-11; severity; domains; dimensional assessment; SIFS; FFiCD
1. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision), 2018. URL: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en (accessed on: 30.03.2023). 2. Widiger TA, Simonsen E. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. J Pers Disord. 2005;19(2):110–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628 3. Galton F. Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review. 1884;36:179–85. 4. Cattell RB. The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1943;38(4):476–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/H0054116 5. Cattell RB. The Main Personality Factors in Questionnaire, Self-Estimate Material. Soc Psychol. 1950;31(1):3–38. 6. Goldberg LR. An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(6):1216–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 7. John OP, Naumann LP, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. OP John, RW Robins, LA Pervin, editors. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 114–58. 8. Orel VE, Senin IG. Osnovy psikhodiagnostiki: uchebnoe posobie. Yaroslavl': YarGU; 2002. 100 р. (In Russ.) 9. Knyazev GG, Mitrofanova LG, Bocharov AV. Validizatsiya russkoyazychnoi versii oprosnika L. Goldberga “Markery faktorov Bol'shoi pyaterki“. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psychological journal]. 2010;31(5):100–10. (In Russ.) 10. Shmelev AG. Psikhodiagnostika lichnostnykh chert. Saint-Petersburg: Rech'; 2002. 480 p. (In Russ.) 11. Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, et al. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42(9):1879–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674 12. Krueger RF, Markon KE. The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:477–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732 13. Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim YR, Crawford MJ. The Development of the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders: An Amalgam of Science, Pragmatism, and Politics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:481–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736 14. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychol Assess. 2018;30(2):154–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459 15. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. Evaluating the assessment of the ICD-11 personality disorder diagnostic system. Psychol Assess. 2019;31(5):674–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000693 16. Gutiérrez F, Aluja A, Ruiz J, et al. Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample. Assessment. 2021;28(3):759–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120936357 17. Saulsman LM, Page AC. The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;23(8):1055–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001 18. Samuel DB, Widiger TA. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationships Between the Five-Factor Model and DSM-IV-TR Personality Disorders: A Facet Level Analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(8):1326–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 19. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11: A Facet-Level Assessment of the ICD-11 Trait Model. Psychol Assess. 2020;32(1):60–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000763 20. Tyrer P, Reed GM., Crawford MJ. Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. Lancet. 2015;385(9969):717–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61995-4 21. Lilienfeld SO. Longitudinal studies of personality disorders: four lessons from personality psychology. J Pers Disord. 2005;19(5):547–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.5.547 22. Olajide K, Munjiza J, Moran P, et al. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD). J Pers Disord. 2018;32(1):44–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2017_31_285 23. Moran P, Leese M, Lee T, et al. Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS): preliminary validation of a brief screen for personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:228–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.228 24. Gamache D, Savard C, Leclerc P, et al. A Proposed Classification of ICD-11 Severity Degrees of Personality Pathology Using the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:628057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628057 25. McCabe GA, Widiger TA. A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 section III personality disorder models. Psychol Assess. 2020;32(1):72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000772 26. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 943 p. 27. Shostakovich BV. Metodologiya i stadii sudebno-psikhiatricheskogo diagnoza. Rukovodstvo po sudebnoi psikhiatrii. TB Dmitrieva, BV Shostakovich, AA Tkachenko, editors. Moscow: Meditsina; 2004. p. 74–81. (In Russ.) 28. Samylkin DV, Tkachenko АА. [The basic role of the “self” and metacognitive processes in self-regulation]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2022;(2):15–25. (In Russ.) DOI: http:// doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2022-10202 29. Samylkin D, Demidova L, Gadisov T, et al. The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 – FFiCD (Russian version). URL: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_Five-Factor_Personality_Inventory_for_ICD-11_FFiCD_Russian_version_/21856938/1 (accessed on: 30.03.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21856938.v1 30. Samylkin D, Demidova L, Gadisov T, et al. The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale – SIFS (Russian version). URL: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/The_Self_and_Interpersonal_Functioning_Scale_SIFS_Russian_version_/21856983/1 (accessed on: 30.03.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21856983.v1
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM