Combined forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of child-parent relations: competence of experts
Suggested citation:
Safuanov FS. [Combined forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of child-parent relations: competence of experts]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2023;(1):14-22. Russian
In order to determine the competences of expert psychologists and psychiatrists, the scientific review considers modern ideas about the organization and methodology of a comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of family relations. The correlation between the competences of experts and the court; differentiation of competencies of a psychologist and a psychiatrist in the course of combined examination; we analyze the difference between the competences of a psychologist in the course of a forensic examination and giving an advisory opinion.
Keywords combined forensic psychological and psychiatric examination; forensic psychological examination; interests of the child; child-parent relations; competence of the expert; judicial disputes about the upbringing of the child
1. Osnovnye pokazateli deyatel'nosti sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertnoi sluzhby Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2020 godu: Analiticheskii obzor. EV Makushkin, editor. Moscow: NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2021. Vol. 29. 203 p. (In Russ. 2. Safuanov FS. Sudebnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza po delam, svyazannym s zashchitoi interesov rebenka. Bekhterevskie chteniya: Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Saint-Petersburg, Kirov; 2003. p. 384–8. (In Russ.) 3. Vostroknutov NV, Kharitonova NK, Safuanov FS. Metodologicheskie osnovy ekspertnogo podkhoda k pravovoi zashchite detei (sudebno-psikhiatricheskii i sudebno-psikhologicheskie aspekty): Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: GNTs SSP im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2004. 28 p. (In Russ.) 4. Safuanov FS, Kharitonova NK, Rusakovskaya OA. Psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza po sudebnym sporam mezhdu roditelyami o vospitanii i meste zhitel'stva rebenka. Moscow: Genezis; 2012. 192 p. (In Russ.) 5. Kharitonova NK, Safuanov FS, Vostroknutov NV, Rusakovskaya OA. Metodologicheskie osnovy provedeniya kompleksnykh sudebnykh psikhologo-psikhiatricheskikh ekspertiz pri sporakh o prave na vospitanie detei: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya ekspertov. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2014;(3):93–106. (In Russ.) 6. Kharitonova NK, Safuanov FS, Vostroknutov NV, et al. Osnovnye ekspertnye ponyatiya, podlezhashchie psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoi kvalifikatsii, v grazhdanskikh sporakh po delam, svyazannym s zashchitoi interesov detei. Metody sudebno-ekspertnogo issledovaniya: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Mental health]. 2014;5(96):3–13. (In Russ.) 7. Kharitonova NK, Rusakovskaya OA. Kompleksnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza po sporam o poryadke vospitaniya detei roditelyami, prozhivayushchimi razdel'no. In: Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya diagnostika. EV Makushkin, AA Tkachenko, editors. Moscow: NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2017. р. 601–25. (In Russ.) 8. Kharitonova NK, Koroleva EV, Rusakovskaya OA. Otsenka sposobnosti lits s psikhicheskimi rasstroistvami k vospitaniyu detei. In: Praktika sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy. TB Dmitrievа, editor. Moscow: NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2010. р. 195–208. (In Russ.) 9. Sekerazh TN. Sudebno-psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza v sporakh o vospitanii detei. In: Sudebnaya psikhiatriya: sovremennye problemy teorii i praktiki (diagnostika, ekspertiza, profilaktika): Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. EV Makushkin, GA Fastovtsov, editors. Moscow: NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2018. р. 145–7. (In Russ.) 10. Marder LD. [Experience of forensic psychological examination on the education and place of residence of children: risks measurement]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and law]. 2013;(1). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2013/n1/58330.shtml (accessed on: 23.12.2022). (In Russ.) 11. Belov VG. Spetsifika i soderzhanie sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy pri brakorazvodnom protsesse. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noi raboty. 2014;(2):7–14. (In Russ.) 12. Kharitonova NK, Safuanov FS, Vostroknutov NV, et al. Organizatsiya i provedenie kompleksnykh sudebnykh psikhologo-psikhiatricheskikh ekspertiz po delam, svyazannym s zashchitoi interesov rebenka: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Mental health]. 2014;3(94):19–32. (In Russ.) 13. Terekhina SA, Pimonov VA. [The problems of defending the interests of juveniles in legal cases of domestic disputes during the divorc]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law]. 2016;(1):91–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060108 14. Rusakovskaya OA, Kalashnikova AS, Kharitonova NK, et al. [The current state and problems of complex psychological and psychiatric evaluation in child custody disputes]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(1):24–36. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957X-2021-10103 15. Il'ina OYu, Rusakovskaya OA, Tumanova LV, Chubarova OE. [Some Psychological and Legal Issues of Mandatory Consideration of the Opinion of a Child who Has Reached the Age of Ten Years in Judicial Consideration of Disputes About His Upbringing]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2022;12(3):27–38. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120303 16. Lapteva AV. Sudebnye spory mezhdu roditelyami o vospitanii rebenka (obzor sovremennykh issledovanii po sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi1 ekspertize). Acta eruditorum. 2022;42:73–7. (In Russ.) 17. Terekhina SA, Oshevskii DS. Eksperimental'no-psikhologicheskie metody obsledovaniya nesovershennoletnikh pri proizvodstve sudebnoi ekspertizy po grazhdanskim delam o zashchite interesov rebenka: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Mental health]. 2012;11(78):10–8. (In Russ.) 18. Terekhina SA. Praktika ispol'zovaniya proby na sovmestnuyu deyatel'nost' v ekspertnykh issledovaniyakh nesovershennoletnikh v grazhdanskom protsesse. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru. 2012;(2). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2012/n2/53458.shtml (accessed on: 01.12.2022). (In Russ.) 19. Safuanov FS, Savina OF, Kalashnikova AS, et al. [The method of studying the interaction of a parent with a child in a comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of family disputes between parents about the upbringing of a child]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(4):36–47. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957X-2021-10405 20. Safuanov FS, Savina OF, Morozova MV, et al. [Parent-Child Interaction: Forensic and Psychological Expert Evaluations]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2022;(1):115–32. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120110 21. Novikova-Grund MV, Rusakovskaya OA, Shvedovskaya AA, Andrianova SB. Psikhosemioticheskii analiz roditel'skogo otnosheniya k svoim detyam materei, stradayushchikh shizofreniei. Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya. 2021;(4):118–36. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2021100406 22. Kulakov SS. [Forensic Psychological Assessment of Family Relationships: the Potential for a Psychosemantic Approach]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2022;(3):14–26. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120302 23. Safuanov FS, Kulakov SS. Zavisimost' struktury semeinogo konflikta ot individual'no-psikhologicheskikh osobennostei roditelei, uchastnikov sporov o vospitanii. Klinicheskaya i spetsial'naya psikhologiya. 2018;(4):100–16. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpse.2018070406 24. Polkunova EV. [Application of the “Parent Essay” to Study Parental Attitudes in Forensic Psychological Examination]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2022;12(3):39–51. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120304 25. Konishcheva AV. [Approaches to the Study of Parental Attitude in Russian Psychology]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2022;(3):88–96. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120308 26. Gul'dan VV, Sukhotin AA, Sushkova EYu, Tokareva GM. Problema indutsirovaniya negativnogo otnosheniya rebenka k odnomu iz roditelei v sudebnykh sporakh. Voprosy psikhologii. 2019;(3):41–50. (In Russ.) 27. Safuanov FS, Kalashnikova AS, Perepravina YuO, Chernen'kov AD. Metodologicheskie osnovy diagnostiki psikhologicheskogo indutsirovaniya rebenka pri proizvodstve kompleksnoi sudebnoi psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy po delam o zashchite interesov detei: Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: NMITs PN im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2020. 39 р. (In Russ.) 28. Terekhina SA, Oshevskii DS. [The problem of using psychological knowledge in family disputes over children in civil legal proceedings]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2018;(2):153–64. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080212 29. Vaske EV, Safuanov FS, Sekerazh TN. Pochemu psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya ekspertiza po sporam, svyazannym s vospitaniem detei, ne otvechaet potrebnostyam pravosudiya. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2020;(1):6–19. (In Russ.) 30. Sekerazh TN. Ekspertnye oshibki pri proizvodstve sudebnoi psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: tipichnye oshibki. Moscow: Prospekt; 2012. p. 101–25. (In Russ.) 31. Nosachev GN, Savel'eva NM. Spory mezhdu roditelyami ob opredelenii mesta zhitel'stva rebenka (detei) i poryadke osushchestvleniya roditel'skikh prav: problemy pravoprimeneniya. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “Semeinoe pravo i zakonodatel'stvo: politicheskie i sotsial'nye orientiry sovershenstvovaniya”. Tver': TGU; 2015. р. 186–91. (In Russ.) 32. Rusakovskaya OA, Safuanov FS, Kharitonova NK. [Current issues of experts' participation in child custody in the event of parents' separation]. Psikhologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2011;(1). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2011/n1/39325.shtml (accessed on: 01.12.2022). (In Russ.) 33. Gor'kovaya IA. Problemnye polya sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy o prave na vospitanie detei. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2017;1(38):55–61. (In Russ.) 34. Safuanov FS, Aleksandrov M.F. Ispol'zovanie psikhologicheskikh znanii v neprotsessual'noi forme pri sudebnykh sporakh mezhdu roditelyami o vospitanii rebenka. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2011;(4):18–23. (In Russ.)
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM