Study of psychoendocrine, psychophysiological and psychological correlates of risk behavior and risk decision making

Full Text:   Subscribers Only

Suggested citation:

Lysenko NE, Pronicheva MM, Peeva OD, et al. [Study of psychoendocrine, psychophysiological and psychological correlates of risk behavior and risk decision making]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2023;(4):91-102. Russian

Abstract

The scientific review summarizes data on modern studies of psychoendocrine, psychophysiological and psychological correlates of risk behavior and risk decision making. Based on the analysis of 91 articles, approaches to the study of decision-making within various scientific disciplines, ideas about the mechanisms of decision-making in risk situations, neurophysiological studies of decision-making, as well as data on psychoendocrine correlates of risk behavior are considered. An analysis of methodological and empirical works devoted to this issue showed that the emerging progress in this area is associated with a growing number of neurophysiological studies of decision-making. It is concluded that consideration of decision-making based on the optimal strategy is vulnerable to criticism, when the influence of the decision maker remains outside the focus of researchers. To expand the understanding of the mechanisms of risk decision-making, it seems important to develop an interdisciplinary approach, including analysis of the neuronal foundations of moral choice, as one of the determinants of the decision-making process.

Keywords decision-making; psychoendocrine and psychophysiological correlates of risk behavior; psychological factors of risk behavior

References

1. Vlasova GI, Neshin MA, Vlasov AS. [Features of maintaining stress resistance and psychophysiological professional training of Russian Emergency Situations Ministry specialists working in special conditions]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo voyennogo instituta voysk natsional'noy gvardii [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg Military Institute of National Guard Troops]. 2020;2(11):55–61. (In Russ.) 2. Strel'nikova YuYu. [Types of psychological and somatic consequences that arise among employees of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia in the process of professional activity]. Vestnik JuUrGU. Serija “Psikhologiya”. 2016;9(1):55–63. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529^у160106 3. Bogdasarov YuV, Ichitovkina YeG, Solov'yev AG. [General and primary incidence of mental disorders in persons observed in medical institutions of internal affairs bodies]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2020;120(6):99–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012006199 4. Alink LR, Cicchetti D, Kim J, Rogosch FA. Longitudinal associations among child maltreatment, social functioning, and cortisol regulation. Dev Psychol. 2012;48(1):224–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024892 5. Fanti KA. Understanding heterogeneity in conduct disorder: A review of psychophysiological studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;91:4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.022 6. Schwabe L, Höffken O, Tegenthoff M, Wolf OT. Stress-induced enhancement of response inhibition depends on mineralocorticoid receptor activation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(10):2319–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.05.001 7. Taber CS, Lodge M. The illusion of choice in democratic politics: the unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. Polit Psychol. 2016;37(S1):61–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12321 8. Terburg D, Morgan B, van Honk J. The testosterone-cortisol ratio: A hormonal marker for proneness to social aggression. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(4):216–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.008 9. Karpov AV, Bashaeva TV, Koneva EV, et al. Psihologiya truda: uchebnik i praktikum dlja vuzov / AV Karpov, editor. Moscow: Jurajt; 2022. 364 p. (In Russ.) 10. Dolyatovskij VA. [Ergonomic tasks of modern management]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya [Fundamental research]. 2022;(9):12–9. (In Russ.) 11. Solnceva GN. [Conditions and situations of professional activity – types and perspectives of changes]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin]. Seriya 14. Psihologiya. 2021;(2):74–100. (In Russ.) 12. Pavlova EM, Kornilova TV, Krasavceva YUV, Bogacheva NV. Lichnostnyj profil' i reguljacija prinjatija reshenij licami medicinskih special'nostej: ot studenta do praktikujushhego vracha. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psihologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie”. 2019;(2):97–115. (In Russ.) 13. Kornilova TV. Lichnostnye osnovaniya prinyatiya reshenij o social'nom distancirovanii v trekh stranah (Rossiya, Azerbajdzhan i Kitaj). In: Novye vyzovy neopredelennosti: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Novosibirsk; 2020. p. 46–9. (In Russ.) 14. Il'in EP. Psihologiya voli. 2-e izd. Saint Petersburg; 2021. 592 p. (In Russ.) 15. Kardanskaya NL. Prinyatie upravlencheskogo resheniya. Moscow; 2017. 407 p. (In Russ.) 16. Kornilova TV. [Latent profiles of personality and decision-making regulation styles]. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy]. 2022;30(2):126–45. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2022300208 17. Kozeleckij YU. Psihologicheskaya teoriya reshenij. Per. s pol'sk. GE Minca,VN Porusa; VV Birjukova, editor. Moscow: Progress; 1979. 504 p. (In Russ.) 18. Lysakov ND. Psihologiya prinyatiya resheniya na polet v slozhnyh meteorologicheskih usloviyah. CHelovecheskij kapital. 2022;2(158):68–74. (In Russ.) 19. Aldasheva AA, Lim VS, Lekalov AA, Runec OV. Sovladanie s neopredelennost'ju i slozhnost'ju letchikami VKS. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya Truda. 2021;6(3):100–17. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp_2021_20_3_005 20. Voronov AI, Chigoryaev EA, Krestyaninov VA. Prinjatie reshenija sotrudnikom policii po primeneniju sredstv prinuzhdenija. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitel'nykh organakh. 2019;24(4(79):410–6. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-6241-2019-14009 21. Waring S, Moran JL, Page R. Decision‐making in multiagency multiteam systems operating in extreme environments. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2020;93(1):629–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12309 22. Razuvaeva TN, Savickij AV. Prinjatie riskovannyh reshenij v zadachah, zadannyh posredstvom interaktivnyh medijnyh sredstv. Izvestiya YUgo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Lingvistika i pedagogika. 2019;3(32):176–85. (In Russ.) 23. Rubahin VF. “Iskusstvennyj intellect” i prinjatie reshenij. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda. 2021;6(3):247–55. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp_2021_20_3_011 24. Lebedev AN. Kvazijeksperimental'noe issledovanie prinjatija reshenij v uslovijah ravnoznachnogo vybora. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2018;11(4):79–93. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2018110407 25. Kuznecov OP. Ogranichennaja racional'nost' i prinjatie reshenij. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinyatie reshenij. 2019;(1):3–15. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14357/20718594190101 26. Kornilova TV, CHumakova MA. Shkaly tolerantnosti i intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikacii oprosnika S. Badnera. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2014;7(1):92–110. (In Russ.) 27. Falikman MV, Pechenkova EV. Principy fiziologii aktivnosti N.A. Bernshtejna v psihologii vosprijatija i vnimanija: problemy i perspektivy. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2016;12(4):48–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120405 28. Gurvich IN, Cvetkova LA, Antonova NA, Ericyan KYU. Konceptualizacija povedenija riska s pozicij psihologicheskoj nauki. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija “Sociologija”. 2014;(3):113–20. (In Russ.) 29. Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. [The problem of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(3):56–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957H-2021-10306 30. Rogacheva TV, Zalevskij GV, Levickaya TE. Psihologiya ekstremal'nyh situacij i sostoyanij: Uchebn. posobie. Tomsk: Izd. dom TGU; 2015. 276 p. (In Russ.) 31. Epel ES, Crosswell AD, Mayer SE, et al. More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2018;49:146–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001 32. Baumgartner JN, Schneider TR. Personality and stress. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 3699–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_2115 33. Vodop'yanova NE, Starchenkova ES. Sub"ektivnye reprezentacii organizacionnoj kul'tury i dinamiki razvitiya psihologicheskogo stressa. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2008;12(4):356–62. (In Russ.) 34. Bergis TA. Psihologiya stressa: praktikum. Tol'yatti: Tol'jattinskij gos. un-t; 2019. 112 p. (In Russ.) 35. Métais C, Burel N, Gillham JE, et al. Integrative Review of the Recent Literature on Human Resilience: From Concepts, Theories, and Discussions Towards a Complex Understanding. Eur J Psychol. 2022;18(1):98–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2251 36. Zhu R, Lin J, Becerik-Gerber B, Li N. Human-building-emergency interactions and their impact on emergency response performance: A review of the state of the art. Safety Science. 2020;127:104691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104691 37. Nguyen HD, Choi M, Han K. Risk-informed decision-making and control strategies for autonomous vehicles in emergency situations. Accid Anal Prev. 2023;193:107305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107305 38. Medvedeva TI, Bolshakova SP, Zinchenko OO, Enikolopova EV. [The emotional decision-making in the situations of uncertainty]. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological studies]. 2015;8(43):10. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i43.524 39. Savickij AV. Lichnostnye osobennosti prinyatiya riskovannyh reshenij v interaktivnoj cifrovoj srede [PhD thesis]. [Sankt-Peterburg (Russia)]: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University named after. 2020. 28 p. (In Russ.) 40. Bruria A, Maya S-T, Gadi S, Orna T. Impact of emergency situations on resilience at work and burnout of Hospital's healthcare personnel. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;76(1):102994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102994 41. Lin J, Li N, Rao L-L, Lovreglio R. Individual wayfinding decisions under stress in indoor emergency situations: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Safety Science. 2023;160(5):106063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106063 42. Prell R, Starcke K. Adding fuel to the fire: The impact of stress on decision-making in dilemmas among emergency service personnel. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 2023;73(4):100872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2023.100872 43. Doncov AI. Psihologiya bezopasnosti. Moscow: Jurajt; 2018. 276 p. (In Russ.) 44. Weber EU. Risk attitude and preference. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010;1(1):79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.5 45. Duffee B, Willis DB. Paramedic perspectives of job stress: Qualitative analysis of high-stress, high-stakes emergency medical situations. Soc Sci Med. 2023;333:116177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116177 46. Sohn W, Kotval-Karamchandani Z. Risk perception of compound emergencies: A household survey on flood evacuation and sheltering behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Cities Soc. 2023;94:104553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104553 47. Abdin SZ, Qureshi F, Iqbal J, Sultana S. Overconfidence bias and investment performance: A mediating effect of risk propensity. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022;22:780–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.03.001 48. Niazashvili AG. Individual'nye razlichiya sklonnosti k risku v raznyh social'nyh situaciyah razvitiya lichnosti [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow University for the Humanities; 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.) 49. Kovaleva IA. Osobennosti gendernogo aspekta v professional'noj kar'ere In: Psihologicheskie nauki: teoriya i praktika: materialy I Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Moscow; 2012. р. 50–2. (In Russ.) 50. Gowen R, Filipowicz A, Ingram KK. Chronotype mediates gender differences in risk propensity and risk-taking. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216619 51. Harlamenkova NE, Tarabrina NV, Byhovec YUV, et al. Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' lichnosti: implicitnaya i eksplicitnaya koncepcii. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN; 2017. 262 p. (In Russ.) 52. Gong Z, Yang J, Gilal FG, et al. Repairing Police Psychological Safety: The Role of Career Adaptability, Feedback Environment, and Goal-Self Concordance Based on the Conservation of Resources Theory. SAGE Open. 2020;10(2):215824402091951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919510 53. Aven T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;253:1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 54. Zinn JO. The meaning of risk-taking – key concepts and dimensions. J Risk Res. 2019;22(1):1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351465 55. Wei S-Y, Kuo Y-K The relationship among safety leadership, risk perception, safety culture, and safety performance: Military volunteer soldiers as a case study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1000331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1000331 56. Cheah YK, Lim HK, Kee ChCh. Personal and Family Factors Associated with High-risk Behaviours Among Adolescents in Malaysia. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;48:92–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.07.012 57. Man SS, Alabdulkarim S, Chan AHS, Zhang T. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate. J Safety Res. 2021;79:329–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014 58. Mironova YUV. Fiziologicheskoe obespechenie emocional'nogo intellekta u lic, sklonnyh k riskovannomu povedeniyu [PhD thesis]. [Volgograd (Russia)]: Volgograd State Medical University; 2017. 24 p. (In Russ.) 59. Slepko YUN. Soderzhanie ponyatiya “effektivnost' professional'noj deyatel'nosti”. YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2010;(4):193–7. (In Russ.) 60. Kubyshko VL, Kruk VM, Vahnina VV, Fedotov AYU. [On the Question of Psychological Support for Occupational Reliability of Power Structures Professionals]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2020;10(4):18–32. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100402 61. Talashmanova KA. Diagnostika professional'noj nadezhnosti sub"ekta. Innovacionnaya nauka [Innovation Science]. 2020;(5):177–83. (In Russ.) 62. Fedotov AYU. Psihologicheskoe obespechenie professional'noj nadezhnosti specialista silovyh struktur [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs; 2020. 49 p. (In Russ.) 63. Efremenko II. Nejrofiziologiya i sensornye sistemy. Vitebsk; 2022. 235 p. (In Russ.) 64. Kovaleva AV. Nejrofiziologiya. Moscow; 2019. 186 p. (In Russ.) 65. Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague P. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):545–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357 66. Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10(3):295–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 67. Samolova VO, Anchugova OV, Zarifulina VD. Nejroekonomika. In: YAzyk v sfere professional'noj kommunikacii: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii prepodavatelej, aspirantov i studentov. Ekaterinburg; 2019. p. 542–7. (In Russ.) 68. Kostychev NA, Batorova EYu, Makushkin AV, Perepelov AV. Zavisimost' kozhno-gal'vanicheskoj reakcii ot emocional'nogo sostoyaniya u yunoshej i devushek. Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019;51(6):34–6. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-06-2019-130 69. Efimova MV, Muhtarova DR. Analiz pokazatelej emocional'noj napryazhennosti pri izmerenii kozhno-gal'vanicheskoj reakcii. Slovo i tekst: psiholingvisticheskij podhod. 2021;(20):93–9. (In Russ.) 70. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. Social Neuroscience: Key Readings. New York; 2005. 312 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496190 71. Enikolopov SN, Medvedeva TI, Voroncova OYU. [Moral dilemmas and personality traits]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2019;9(2):141–55. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090210 72. Bulygina VG, Isangalieva IM, Peeva OD, et al. [Current Studies of The Neuronal Foundations of Moral Decision-Making]. Psihologiya i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2023;13(2):110–26. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130209 73. Zhang D, Gu R, Broster LS, et al. Linking brain electrical signals elicited by current outcomes with future risk decision-making. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00084 74. Zhozhikashvili NA, Bakumova AD, Bochkovskaya IA. Al'fa- i teta-ritmy kak markery kognitivnogo usiliya. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal [Russian Psychological Journal]. 2022;19(2):201–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.15 75. Zaleshin AV, Merzhanova GH. [Phase time lag between EEG rhythms in human behavior on choosing a risk-associated reward]. ZHurnal vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti im. I.P. Pavlova [Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology]. 2019;69(1):14–22. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044467719010143 76. Karatygin NA, Korobejnikova II, Venerina YAA, et al. [Spectral Characteristics of the EEG Theta-Band and Efficiency of Cognitive Test “N-Back” Performing]. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2022;15(2):95–110. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150208 77. Yapl ZA. Nejrofiziologicheskie korrelyaty prinyatiya reshenij v usloviyah riska [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: National Research University Higher School of Economics; 2019. 37 p. (In Russ.) 78. Novikova SI. [EEG rhythms and cognitive processes]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. 2015;4(1):91–108. (In Russ.) 79. Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research – Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017;8:213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213 80. Murtazina EP, Matyul'ko IS, ZHuravlev BV, Golubeva NK. [Somatoautonomic components of social interactions (review)]. ZHurnal mediko-biologicheskih issledovanij [Journal of Medical and Biological Research]. 2019;(3):349–62. (In Russ.) 81. Mkrtychyan AS, Koroleva SV. [Psychophysiological Model of Stress-Induced Cardiovascular Disorders Development Risk]. Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya [Psychology. Psychophysiology]. 2019;(3):83–92. (In Russ.) 82. Pavlov KI, Petrenko MI, Muhin VN, et al. [Psychophysiological predictors of military-occupational adaptation of first-year cadets of a naval institute]. Psihologiya obrazovaniya v polikul'turnom prostranstve [Psychology of education in a multicultural space]. 2021;(1):18–36. (In Russ.) 83. Kubasov RV. [Hormonal Changes in Response to Extreme Environment Factors]. Vestnik RAMN [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences]. 2014;9–10:102–9. (In Russ.) 84. Ribeiro SC. Interface of physical and emotional stress regulation through the endogenous opioid system and mu-opioid receptors. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005;29(8):1264–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.011 85. Lam JCW, Shields GS, Trainor BC, et al. Greater lifetime stress exposure predicts blunted cortisol but heightened DHEA responses to acute stress. Stress Health. 2019;35(1):15–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2835 86. Kochetkov YaA. Markery gormonal'nogo balansa pri depressivnyh rasstrojstvah [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moscow State University; 2009. 23 p. (In Russ.) 87. Hadzhieva NH. Struktura, diagnostika i lechenie stress-zavisimyh narushenij menstrual'nogo cikla [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; 2021. 22 p. (In Russ.) 88. Fries E, Dettenborn L, Kirschbaum C. The cortisol awakening response (CAR): facts and future directions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;72(1):67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.014 89. Stephens MA, Mahon PB, McCaul ME, Wand GS. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress: Effects of biological sex and circulating sex hormones. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;66:47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.12.021 90. Schindler L, Shaheen M, Saar-Ashkenazy R, et al. Victims of War: Dehydroepiandrosterone Concentrations in Hair and Their Associations with Trauma Sequelae in Palestinian Adolescents Living in the West Bank. Brain Sci. 2019;9(2):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9020020 91. Hennessey EP, Kepinska O, Haft SL, et al. Hair cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations: Associations with executive function in early childhood. Biol Psychol. 2020;155:107946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107946



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34757/1560-957X.2023.27.4.010

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM