Features of the personality system relevant to the processes of self-regulation in defendants with personality disorders
|
Full Text:
Subscribers Only
|
Suggested citation:
Samylkin DV, Tkachenko AA. [Features of the personality system relevant to the processes of self-regulation in defendants with personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2025;(2):27-37. Russian
In this single-stage retrospective study for the purpose of a differentiated study of the formal-dynamic and structural-meaningful characteristics of personality relevant to the processes of mental self-regulation, 54 criminal defendants were examined, divided into 3 groups: persons with personality disorders (22 people), schizotypal personality disorder (8 people), paranoid schizophrenia (24 people), and also, 11 mentally healthy volunteers. As a result of the study of temperamental characteristics in people with PD, a decrease in the speed and energy characteristics of probabilistic intellectual activity was found, which cause a deficiency in the operational and technical level of activity regulation. Qualitative differences were also found in the structure of the motivational and semantic sphere of people with PD and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In PD, it is characterized by semantic lability and insufficient hierarchization of the semantic sphere, in schizophrenia spectrum disorders – by rigidity and fragmentation. These features create prerequisites for a distorted assessment of a legally significant situation by persons with PD, the formation of its pathological meaning, and consequently, an impairment of the semantic level of self-regulation.
Keywords personality disorder; schizotypal personality disorder; temperament; motivation; self-regulation
1. Snezhnevskij AV. Shizofreniya. Mul`tidisciplinarnoe issledovanie. Mosсow: Medicina; 1972. 463 p. (In Russ.) 2. Smulevich AB. Shizofreniya i rasstrojstva shizofrenicheskogo spektra (mul`tidisciplinarnoe issledovanie): Kollektivnaya monografiya. Moscow: Gorodecz; 2024. 480 p. (In Russ.) 3. Melexov DE. Klinicheskie osnovy` prognoza trudosposobnosti pri shizofrenii. Moscow: Gosizdat medlit; 1963. 198 p. (In Russ.) 4. Frejerov OE. O psixopaticheskix (anomal`ny`x), akcentirovanny`x i deformirovanny`x lichnostyax. In: Problemy` lichnosti. Materialy` simpoziuma. T. 2. Moscow; 1970. р. 230–48. (In Russ.) 5. Xaleczkij AM. Psixopatii. In: Sudebnaya psixiatriya. Moscow: Medgiz; 1950. р. 272–96. (In Russ.) 6. Timofeev NN. Problemy` psixopatii v eyo teoreticheskom i prakticheskom aspektax. In: Trudy` 4-go Vsesoyuznogo s`ezda nevropatologov i psixiatrov. T. 5. Moscow; 1965. р. 113. (In Russ.) 7. Lazurskij AF. Obshhie osnovy` klassifikacii lichnostej. In: Klassifikaciya lichnostej. MYa Basov, VN Myasishhev, editors. Moscow: Gosizdat; 1923. р. 11–50. (In Russ.). 8. Rusalov VM. Temperament v strukture individual'nosti cheloveka: Differencial'no-psihofiziologicheskie i psihologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN; 2012. 528 p. (In Russ.). 9. Brushlinskii AV. Problemy psikhologii sub"ekta. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN; 1994. 109 p. (In Russ.) 10. Merlin VS. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1986. 256 p. (In Russ.) 11. Demidova LYu, Gadisov TG, Tkachenko AA. [Individual differences during compensation and decompensation in personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(4):48–60. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47877/1560- 957Х-2021-10304. 12. Megrabyan AA. Patologiya lichnosti. In: Obshhaya psixopatologiya. Moscow: Medicina; 1972. р. 212–29. (In Russ.) 13. Asmolov AG. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU; 1990. 367 p. (In Russ.) 14. Borozdina LV. [The concept of personality and character based on the activity theory of A. Leontiev]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. 2015;(4):3–12. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.11621/npj.2015.0401 15. Bobrov AE. [Personalized psychiatric care and psychotherapy]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(1):49–56. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24411/1560-957X-2020-12005 16. Gadisov TG, Tkachenko AA. [Differentiated evaluation of sanity in compensation and decompensation of personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2022;(5):4–12. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47877/1560-957 17. Trofimova I, Sulis W. Is temperament activity-specific? Validation of the Structure of Temperament Questionnaire-Compact (STQ-77). Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2011;11(3):389–400. 18. Mil'man VE. Metod izucheniya motivatsionnoi sfery lichnosti. In: Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnostika motivatsii i samoregulyatsii. Moscow: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova; 1990. р. 23–43. (In Russ.) 19. Trofimova I. Contingent tunes of neurochemical ensembles in the norm and pathology: Can we see the patterns? Neuropsychobiology. 2021;80(2):101–33. DOI: 10.1159/000513688 20. Hamilton RKB, Newman JP. Information processing capacity in psychopathy: Effects of anomalous attention. Personal Disord. 2018;9(2):182–7. DOI: 10.1037/per0000223 21. Gul'dan VV, Ivannikov VA. [Features of the formation and use of past experience in psychopathic individuals]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 1974;(12):1830–6. (In Russ.) 22. Cleckley H. The mask of sanity. N.Y.: New Amer. libr.; Saint Louis (Mo.): Mosby, Cop.; 1982. 285 p. 23. SHostakovich BV. Rasstroistva lichnosti (psihopatii) v sudebno-psihi- atricheskoi praktike. Moscow: MBA; 2006. 372 p. (In Russ.) 24. Leont'ev DA. Psihologiya smysla: Priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj real'nosti: Ucheb. posobie dlja studentov vuzov, obuchajushhihsja po napravleniju i special'nostjam psihologii. Moscow: Smysl; 2003. 487 p. (In Russ.) 25. Shmukler AB, Karyakina MV. Setevoj analiz kak novyj issledovatel'skij podhod v psihiatrii. Psihiatriya i psihofarmakoterapiya [Psychiatry and psychopharmacotherapy]. 2020;(5):4–8. (In Russ.) 26. Cramer AOJ, Can Der Sluis S, Noordhof A, et al. Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can’t like Parties if you Don’t like People. Eur J Pers. 2012;26(4):414–31. DOI: 10.1002/per.1866 27. Furr RM, Fleeson W, Anderson M, Arnorld EM. On the Contributions of a Network Approach to Personality Theory and Research. Eur J Pers. 2012;26(4):437–9. DOI: 10.1002/per.1871 28. Strelyau Ya. Rol' temperamenta v psikhicheskom razvitii. Moscow: Progress; 1982. 231 p. (In Russ.) 29. Read SJ, Miller LC. Behavioral regulation relies on interacting forces and predictive models. J Pers. 2023;91(4):917–27. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12815 30. Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):5–13. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20375 31. Kudryavtsev IA, Safuanov FS. Emotsional'naya i smyslovaya reg- ulyatsiya vospriyatiya u psikhopaticheskikh lichnostei vozbudimogo i istericheskogo kruga. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 1984;84(12):1815–22. (In Russ.) 32. Tkachenko AA, Demidova LYu, Kirenskaya AV, Storozheva ZI. Clinical transforming of personality disorders: comorbidity, severity or dynamical changes in the structure of individuality? Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2022;43:88–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.08.010 33. Kondrat`ev FV. Sud`by` bol`ny`x shizofreniej: kliniko-social`ny`j i sudebno-psixiatricheskij aspekty`. Moscow: Justicinform; 2010. 120 p. (In Russ.) 34. Ilyushina EA, Tkachenko AA. [Peculiarities of mechanisms involved in the formation of syndromes of delusional and delusion-like states]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2013;(1):36–44. (In Russ.) 35. Samylkin DV, Tkachenko AA. [The structure of the abnormal personality as a violation of the temporal perspective]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;44(3):32–44. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47877/1560-957Х-2021-10304
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM