Surveying psychiatrists on topical issues of implementing compulsory security measures and medical treatment

Full Text:
Read (RU)

Suggested citation:

Dukorskiy VV, Skugarevskaya EI, Balashov AD. [Surveying psychiatrists on topical issues of implementing compulsory security measures and medical treatment]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2013;(6):31-36. Russian

Abstract

The paper discusses the results of an anonymous survey of psychiatrists on topical issues of coersive measures of security and compulsory treatment. Involved in the study were 119 practicing psychiatrists from all regions of the Republic of Belarus, who are directly concerned with the implementation of coercive measures. The focus is on diverse points of view about different aspects of compulsory security measures and treatment: danger posed by persons with mental disorders, violence risk assessment and confidence that one’s own assessment is valid and reliable, psychiatrist’s responsibility, covert rules and the current state of compulsory treatment. More than half of psychiatrists (62%) believe that people with mental illnesses pose danger to society. According to 52,1% of physicians nobody should be held responsible for socially dangerous acts committed by an insane person while 50,4% of physicians believe that this also holds true in the case of repeated acts of violence. 47,1% of respondents note that they go by covert rules in their practice of compulsory treatment. Based on the results of questionnaire survey, techniques and procedures are considered that would go a long way towards optimizing the implementation of coercive measures of security and treatment.

References

1. Бартол К. Психология криминального поведения. - СПб., 2004. - 352 с. 2. Блэкборн Р. Психология криминального поведения. - CПб., 2004. - 496 с. 3. Гельдер М., Гет Д., Мейо Р. и др. Оксфордское руководство по психиатрии. - Киев, 1999. - 735 с. 4. Дукорский В.В. Специфика реализации принудительных мер безопасности и лечения в странах англо-саксонского права // Мед. журн. - 2012. - № 1. - С. 29-33. 5. Мотов В.В. Фундаментальные вопросы американской судебной психиатрии и психиатрии права. - М.: Фолиум, 2008. - 252 c. 6. Hanson A. Conviction of French psychiatrist no cause for alarm for U.S. psychiatrists // Clinical Times News. - 2012. [journal on-line]; available from http://www.clinicalpsychiatrynews.com/views/shrink-rap-news/blog 7. Miller S.L., Brodsky S.L. Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence // J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law. - 2011. - Vol. 39. - P. 396-401. 8. Mullen P.E. Schizophrenia and violence: from correlations to preventive strategies // Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. - 2006. - Vol. 12. - P. 239-248. 9. Singh J.P. Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Schizophrenia and Other Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Validity, Reliability, and Item Content of 10 Available Instruments // Schizophr. Bull. - 2011. - Vol. 37. - P. 899-912. 10. Simon R.I., Gold L.I. Textbook of Forensic Psychiatry. - Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2010. - 726 p. 11. Troquete N.A.C., Brink R.H.S., Beitema H. et al. Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: cluster randomised controlled trial // Br. J. Psychiatry. - 2013. - Vol. 202. - P. 365-371.



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2013-11373

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM