Subliminal and liminal visual stimulation in psychophysiological polygraph testing
Suggested citation:
Kupcova DM, Kamenskov MYu, Rybin PV. [Subliminal and liminal visual stimulation in psychophysiological polygraph testing]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2019;(2):54-63. Russian
In the original study to determine the possibility of using subliminal visual stimulation in polygraph testing for the diagnosis of paraphilic disorders, 70 men were examined. Clinical, psychopathological, psychological, sexological and psychophysiological methods were used. According to the results of the study, in which the possibility of using subthreshold visual stimulation during polygraph testing was evaluated for the first time, it can be concluded that the change in vegetative processes does not allow to judge the importance of the stimuli presented, and it is recommended to conduct such studies related to the registration of brain potentials.
Keywords visual stimulation; liminal perception; subliminal perception; polygraph
1. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73(6):1154–63. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 2. Filippova MG. [Perception without awareness and the appropriateness of his participation in psychodiagnostic research]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta [Bulletin of St. Petersburg University]. 2008;(2):101–8. Russian. 3. Spiering M, Evaraerd W, Janssen E. Priming the sexual system. Implicit versus explicit activation. Journal of Sex Research. 2003;40:134–45. DOI: 10.1080/00224490309552175 4. Janssen E, Everaerd W, Spiering M, Janssen J. Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: towards an information processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research. 2000;37:8–23. 5. Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Shaver P.R. Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effects on men and women. Journal of Sex Research. 2007;44:111–21. DOI: 10.1080/00224490701263579 6. Gillath O, Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Shaver P.R. When sex primes love: Subliminal sexual priming motivates relational goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008;34:1057–69. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208318141 7. Gillath O, Canterberry M. Neural correlates of exposure to subliminal and supraliminal sexual cues. Social cognitive affective neuroscience. 2012;7(8):924–36. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr065 8. Bargh JA. What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;36(2):147–68. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.336 9. Georgiadis JR, Kringelbach ML. The human sexual response cycle: brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Progress in neurobiology. 2012;98(1):49–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.004 10. Oglobin SI, Molchanov AYu. Instrumental'naya «detektsiya lzhi»: akademicheskiy kurs. Yaroslavl. 2004. 464 p. Russian. 11. Ivanov RS. [Individual symptom complex as a tool for interpreting the results of psycho-physiological research using a polygraph]. Natsional'nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. 2014;(3):90–7. Russian. 12. Pelenitsyn AB, Soshnikov AP. Sovremennyye tekhnologii primeneniya poligrafa. Moscow; 2015. 224 p. Russian. 13. Gougler M, Chair C, Handler M, et al. Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques. Polygraph. 2011;40(4):194–295. 14. Kuptsova DM, Kamenskov MYu. [Influence of psychosexual and psychological factors on]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2018;8(1):13–25. Russian. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080102 15. Kamenskov MYu. Kliniko-patogeneticheskiye i diagnosticheskiye aspekty parafiliy i ikh sudebno-psikhiatricheskoye znacheniye [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Natsional'nyy meditsinskiy issledovatel'skiy tsentr psikhiatrii i narkologii imeni VP Serbskogo [National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology named after VP Serbian]; 2017. 45 p. Russian. 16. Marko M, Riečanský I. Sympathetic arousal, but not disturbed executive functioning, mediates the impairment of cognitive flexibility under stress. Cognition. 2018;174:94–102. 17. Zahn TP, Rosenthal D, Lawlor WG. Electrodermal and heart rate orienting reactions in chronic schizophrenia. Journal of psychiatric research. 1968;6:117–34. 18. Chong LL, Evian G, Anthony H, et al. Electrodermal activity in schizophrenia: a quantitative study using a short interstimulus paradigm. Biological Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):127–35. 19. Perry W, Felger T, Braff D. The relationship between skin conductance hyporesponsivity and perseverations in schizophrenia patients. Biological Psychiatry. 1998;44(6):459–65. 20. Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2015;15(10):483–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 21. Ameller A, Picard A, D'Hondt F, et al. Implicit Recognition of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces in Schizophrenia: A Study of the Skin Conductance Response in Familiarity Disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8(181):490–501. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00181 22. Rachow T, Berger S, Boettger MK, et al. Nonlinear relationship between electrodermal activity and heart rate variability in patients with acute schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(10):1323–32. 23. Wang P, Gao Y, Isen J, et al. Genetic covariance between psychopathic traits and anticipatory skin conductance responses to threat: Evidence for a potential endophenotype. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27(4Pt1):1313–22. 24. Patrick CJ, Iacono WG. Psychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1989;74(2):347–55. 25. Floch M. Limitations of the lie detector. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1950;40:651–2. 26. Vvedenskij GE, Safuanov FS, Kamenskov MJu, et al. [Poll using a polygraph: the psychiatric contraindications]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2011;5:31–6. Russian. 27. Spiering M, Everaerd W. The sexual unconscious. In: Janssen E, ed. The Psychophysiology of Sex. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2007;166–84. 28. Graf H, Wiegers M, Metzger CD, et al. Differential Noradrenergic Modulation of Monetary Reward and Visual Erotic Stimulus Processing. Front Psychiatry. 2018;31(9):346. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00346 29. Habermeyer B, Händel N, Lemoine P, et al. LH-RH agonists modulate amygdala response to visual sexual stimulation: a single case fMRI study in pedophilia. Neurocase. 2012;18(6):489–95. 30. Brand M, Snagowski J, Laier C, Maderwald S. Ventral striatum activity when watching preferred pornographic pictures is correlated with symptoms of Internet pornography addiction. Neuroimage. 2016;1(129):224–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.033 31. Habermeyer B, Esposito F, Händel N, et al. Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in paedophilia and controls: a case control study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;19(13):88. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-88 32. Goldman-Rakic PS. The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1996;351(1346):1445–53. 33. Kirenskaya А, Kamenskov М, Myamlin V, et al. The antisaccade task performance deficit and specific CNV abnormalities in patients with stereotyped paraphilia and schizophrenia. Journal of forensic sciences. 2013;58(5):1219–26. 34. Wernicke M, Hofter C, Jordan K, et al. Neural correlates of subliminally presented visual sexual stimuli. Conscious Cognition. 2017;49:35–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.011 35. Kostandov E, Arzumanov Y. Evoked cortical potentials on emotional unconscious words. ZHurnal vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti im. IP Pavlova [Journal of higher nervous activity by IP Pavlov]. 1974;3:465.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2019-11921
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM