Development of the general model of self-regulation in forensic psychiatry. Paper 4. Situation: remembering of the future
Suggested citation:
Tkachenko AA, Demidova LYu. [Development of the general model of self-regulation in forensic psychiatry. Paper 4. Situation: remembering of the future]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(1):27-41. Russian
The aim of this review is considering the role of situation in regulation of behavior. Conceptions of personal-situational interaction are described. It is shown that attempts to classify situations are fraught with serious predicament, since the perception of specific context is very variable. Subjective and personal understanding of the situation is determined by the unique history of interactions with the environment. The experience gained throughout life determines the hypotheses about the world what the subject will form, his predictions in specific circumstances about the possible outcomes of the situation. The correct perception of the world is not in the objective reflection of it, but in the successful adaptation to it, accurate predictions which were made.
Keywords situation; enactivism; environment; experience; regulation; prediction
1. Mulvey EP, Lidz CW. Conditional prediction: a model for research on dangerousness to others in a new era. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1995;18(2):129–43. DOI: 10.1016/0160-2527(95)00002-Y 2. Large M, Nielssen O. The limitations and future of violence risk assessment. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):25–6. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20394 3. Kondrat'ev FV. Sistemno-strukturnyi analiz rasstroistv povedeniya kak metod diagnostiki v psikhiatrii. In: Voprosy diagnostiki v sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi praktike. Ed. Morozov GV. Moscow: Logosvos, 1990. P. 9–18. Russian. 4. Kudryavtsev IA. Sudebnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1988. 224 p. Russian. 5. Vandysh VV. Printsipy ekspertnoi otsenki organicheskikh psikhicheskikh rasstroistv v sootvetstvii so st. 22 UK RF. In: Ogranichennaya vmenyaemost'. Eds. Dmitrieva TB, Shostakovich BV, Tkachenko AA. Moscow: Medkniga, 2008. P. 49–5. Russian. 6. Safuanov FS. Kriterii ekspertnoi otsenki ogranichennoi vmenyaemosti obvinyaemykh v agressivnykh prestupleniyakh. In: Ogranichennaya vmenyaemost'. Eds. Dmitrieva TB, Shostakovich BV, Tkachenko AA. Moscow: Medkniga, 2008. P. 166–81. Russian. 7. Khryashchev AV. Klinicheskie i situativnye kriterii vmenyaemosti lits s psikhicheskimi anomaliyami [Clinical and situational criteria of sanity in persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2003;(2):33–6. Russian. 8. Bulygina VG, Shekhovtsova ES, Dubinskii AA. Situatsionnyi analiz kak etap prinyatiya reshenii v norme i pri psikhicheskoi patologii [Situational analysis as a stage of decision-making in norm and mental pathology]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov’e [Mental Health]. 2018;16(2):26–31. Russian. DOI: 10.25557/2074-014X.2018.02.26-31 9. Savina OF, Makushkin EV, Morozova MV. Algoritm ekspertnogo issledovaniya dizregulyatsii deyatel'nosti v kriminal'noi situatsii u lits s psikhicheskimi rasstroistvami [The algorithm of forensic expert study of the dysregulation of activity in criminal situation in persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2018;(1):31–42. Russian. 10. Levin K. Povedenie i razvitie kak funktsiya obshchei situatsii. In: Teoriya polya v sotsial'nykh naukakh. Saint Petersburg: «Sensor», 2000. P. 263–330. Russian. 11. Burlachuk LF, Mikhailova NB. K psikhologicheskoi teorii situatsii [Concerning psychological theory of situation]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2002;23(1):5–17. Russian. 12. Filippov AV, Kovalev SV. Situatsiya kak element psikhologicheskogo tezaurusa. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1986;(1):14–21.Russian. 13. Vuketich FM. Evolyutsiya i poznanie. Paradigmy, perspektivy, problem. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. P. 275–314. Russian. 14. Osukhova NG. Psikhologicheskaya pomoshch' v trudnykh i ekstremal'nykh situatsiyakh. Moscow: Izdatel'skii tsentr «Akademiya», 2007. 288 p. Russian. 15. Sergienko EA, Vilenskaya GA, Kovaleva YuV. Kontrol' povedeniya kak sub"ektnaya regulyatsiya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010. 352 p. Russian. 16. Magnusson D. A psychology of situations. In: Toward a psychology of situations. An interactional perspective. Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1981. P. 9–32. 17. Endler NS, Magnusson D. Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin. 1976;83(5):956–74. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.956 18. Ross L, Nisbett R. Chelovek i situatsiya. Perspektivy sotsial'noi psikhologii. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1999. 429 p. Russian. 19. Knyazeva EN. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya v retrospektive i perspective. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. P. 5–38. Russian. 20. Foll'mer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya. K prirode chelovecheskogo poznaniya. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. S. 189–204. Russian. 21. Masuda T. Cultural effects on visual perception. In: Encyclopedia of perception. Vol. 1. Ed. Goldstein EB. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2010. P. 339–43. 22. Tkachenko AA, Demidova LYu. Postroenie obshchei modeli samoregulyatsii v sudebnoi psikhiatrii. Soobshchenie 3. Rozhdenie intentsii [Development of the general model of self-regulation in forensic psychiatry. Paper 3. Appearance of intention]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2019;(2):17–27. Russian. DOI: 10.24411/1560-957X-2019-11916 23. Davtyan SE, Davtyan EN. O prirode cheloveka v svete postneklassicheskoi nauki (bipersonal'naya model' lichnosti) [The human nature in the light of postnonclassical science (bipersonal model of personality)]. Nevrologicheskii vestnik [Neurological Bulletin]. 2017;XLIX(1).61–8. Russian. 24. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press; 1986. 332 p. 25. Barsalou LW. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In: Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factros in categorization. Ed. Neisser U. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987. P. 101–40. 26. Petrenko VF. Osnovy psikhosemantiki. Moscow: Eksmo, 2010. 480 p. Russian. 27. Shvyrkov VB. Vvedenie v ob"ektivnuyu psikhologiyu: neironal'nye osnovy psikhiki: izbrannye trudy. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006. 592 p. Russian. 28. Mendelevich VD, Solov'eva SL. Nevrozologiya i psikhosomaticheskaya meditsina. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2002. 608 p. Russian. 29. Falikman MV. Kognitivnaya nauka v XXI veke: organizm, sotsium, kul'tura. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka «Dubna» [Dubna Psychological Journal]. 2012;(3):31–7. Russian. 30. Savenko YuS. Biopsikhosotsial'naya model' psikhicheskikh rasstroistv i interdistsiplinarnost' [Biopsychosocial model of mental disorders and interdisciplinary]. Nezavisimyi psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Independent Psychiatric Journal]. 2018;(3):8–13. Russian. 31. Rubinshtein SL. Bytie i soznanie. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1957. 328 p Russian. 32. Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E. The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2016. 322 p. 33. Clark A, Chalmers D. The Extended Mind. Analysis. 1998;58(1):7–19. DOI: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7 34. Maturana HR, Varela FJ. Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel publishing company; 1980. 171 p. 35. Friston KJ. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(2):127–38. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2787 36. Rao RPN, Ballard DH. Predictive Coding in the Visual Cortex: a Functional Interpretation of Some Extra-classical Receptive-field Effects. Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2(1):79–87. DOI: 10.1038/4580 37. Holst E von, Mittelstaedt H. Das reafferenzprincip: wechselwirkungen zwischen zentralnervensystem und peripherie. Die naturwissenschften. 1950;37(20):464–76. DOI: 10.1007/bf00622503 38. Baars B, Geidzh N. Mozg, poznanie, razum: vvedenie v kognitivnye neironauki : V 2 t. T. 2. Moscow: Laboratoriya znanii, 2019. 469 p. Russian. 39. Popper KR, Eccles JC. The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer International; 1977. 598 p. 40. Lorenz K. Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Der Artgenosse als auslösendes Moment sozialer Verhaltensweisen. Journal für Ornithologie. 1935;83(2):137–213. 41. Lumsden CJ, Wilson EO. Promethean fire. Reflections on the Origin of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1983. 218 p. 42. Bridgman PW. Remarks on Niels Bohr’s Talk. Daedalus. 1958;87(2):175–7. 43. Lorents K. Po tu storonu zerkala. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012a. P. 75–108. Russian. 44. Popper K. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012. P. 110–33. Russian. 45. Tkachenko AA. Predmet sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy i translyatsionnaya meditsina [The subject of forensic psychiatric examination and translational medicine]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov’e [Mental Health]. 2016;(11):3–14. Russian. 46. Allen M, Friston KJ. From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese. 2018;195(6):2459–82. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5 47. Lorents K. Kantovskaya kontseptsiya a priori v svete sovremennoi biologii. In: Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya. Antologiya. Moscow: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2012b. P. 43–74. Russian. 48. Maksimova NE, Aleksandrov IO. Vozmozhnaya traektoriya evolyutsionnogo razvitiya psikhologii. Chast' I. Eksperimental'naya metodologiya kak sposob sozdaniya novogo psikhologicheskogo znaniya v issledovanii [The prospective trajectory for psychology evolution. Part I. Experimental methodology as the approach to invention of new psychological knowledge by means of research]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2016a;37(1):5–15. Russian. 49. Anokhin PK. Sistemogenez kak obshchaya zakonomernost' evolyutsionnogo protsessa. In: P.K. Anokhin. Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional'noi sistemy. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1978. P. 125–151. Russian. 50. Steinberg MS, Brown DE, Clement J. Genius is not imune to persistent misconceptions: conceptual difficulties impeding Isaac Newton and contemporary physics students. International Journal of Science Education. 1990;12(3):265–73. DOI: 10.1080/0950069900120305 51. Spencer H. The Development Hypothesis. In: Illustrations of Universal Progress: A Series of Discussion. New York: Appleton and Company; 1865. P. 377–83. 52. Werner H. Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: Percheron press; 2004. 540 p. 53. Edelman GM. The remembered present. A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books, Inc.; 1989. 346 p. 54. Leont'ev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla. Moscow: Smysl, 2007. 511 p. Russian. 55. Chuprikova NI. Neizvestnyi Vygotskii: kul'turno-istoricheskaya teoriya v kontekste pavlovskoi teorii vysshei nervnoi deyatel'nosti i differentsionnoi teorii razvitiya Kh. Vernera [Unknown Vygotsky: Cultural-Historical Theory in the Context of Pavlov’s Theory of Higher Nervous Activity and H. Werner’s Differential Development Theory]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology]. 2016;12(3):239–46. Russian. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2016120313 56. Vygotskii LS. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. Sobranie sochinenii: V 6 t. T. 3. Ed. Matyushkin AM. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 368 p. Russian. 57. Porshnev BF. O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii. Moscow: «FERI-V», 2006. 640 p. Russian. 58. Pavlov IP. Proba fiziologicheskogo ponimaniya simptomologii isterii. In: Lektsii o rabote bol'shikh polusharii golovnogo mozga. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo «E», 2017. P. 437–454. Russian. 59. Sushchin MA. Kontseptsiya situativnogo poznaniya v kognitivnoi nauke: kriticheskii analiz [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Institut filosofii RAN [Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences]; 2014. 22 p. Russian. 60. Chabris C, Simons D. The invisible gorilla and other ways our intuitions deceive us. New York: Crown; 2010. 306 p. 61. Anokhin PK. Osobennosti afferentnogo apparata uslovnogo refleksa i ikh znachenie dlya psikhologii. In: Anokhin P.K. Sistemnye mekhanizmy vysshei nervnoi deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. P. 309–337. Russian. 62. Maksimova NE, Aleksandrov IO. Vozmozhnaya traektoriya evolyutsionnogo razvitiya psikhologii. Chast' II. Organizatsiya predmetnoi oblasti psikhologii [The prospective trajectory for psychology evolution. Part II. Organization of the subject field of psychology]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2016b;37(2):5–18. Russian. 63. Knyazeva EN. Glaz uma: ponyatiya mental'nykh obrazov i voobrazheniya ot Berkli do sovremennoi kognitivnoi nauki. In: Problema voobrazheniya v evolyutsionnoi epistemologii. Moscow: IF RAN, 2013. P. 30–51. Russian. 64. Ingvar DH. «Memory of the future»: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Human Neurobiology. 1985;4(3):127–36. 65. Shkurko AV. Ot raspredelennogo poznaniya k raspredelennomu resheniyu zadach: sotsiologicheskaya perspektiva v razvitii kognitivnoi nauki [From distributed cognition to distributed problem solving: sociologic perspective in cognitive science development]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. 2010; 7(3):3–22. Russian. 66. Khaken G. Printsipy raboty golovnogo mozga: Sinergeticheskii podkhod k aktivnosti mozga, povedeniyu i kognitivnoi deyatel'nosti. Moskcow: PER SE, 2001. 351 p. Russian. 67. Kornilova TV. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnoi regulyatsii reshenii i vyborov [Psychology of ambiguity: unity of intellectual and personal regulation of decisions and choices]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013;34(3):89–100. Russian. 68. Vekker LM. Psikhicheskie protsessy. T. 2. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta, 1976. 342 p. Russian. 69. Frenkel-Brunswik E. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality. 1949;18(1):108–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2020-12003
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM