Public policy models for reducing non-medical use of psychoactive substances (Part 1)
Suggested citation:
Kekelidze ZI, Klimenko TV, Kozlov AA. [Public policy models for reducing non-medical use of psychoactive substances (Part 1)]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(3):14-21. Russian
In this scientific review, pursuing the objective of analysis, we look at the main models (forms) of public anti-psychoactive substance policy and related anti-psychoactive substance strategy, aimed at bringing down the level of psychoactive substance consumption among the population of the Russian Federation. We show a wide range of prevention measures within the framework of each of the models of the anti-psychoactive substance strategy. We provide substantiation for the view that the organization of addiction medicine care, as an important part of the anti-psychoactive substance strategy, must correspond to the overall ideology of the anti-psychoactive substance policy.
Keywords policy; strategy; psychoactive substance; medical care; addiction medicine
1. Narkologiya: Natsional'noe rukovodstvo. Pod red. NN Ivantsa, IP Anokhinoi, MA Vinnikovoi. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. 944 p. Russian. 2. Leighton GN, Bargiel CS. A History of Illinois Drug Control Laws from 1818 to 1975. J Marshall, J Prac & Proc. 1975;9:148–62. 3. New York Medical Journal Editors. Mental sequelae of the Harrison Law. N Y Med J. 1915;102:1014. 4. National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) / National Institute of National Health (NIH). URL: https://www.drugabuse.gov. 5. Public Law No. 223, 63rd Cong., approved December 17, 1914. 6. Stripping the Medical Profession of Its Powers and Giving Them to a Body of Lawmakers. The Proposed Amendment to the Harrison Narcotic Act – Everybody Seems to Know All About Doctoring Except the Doctors. Illinois Medical Journal. 1926;49:447. 7. Task Force Report: Narcotics and Drug Abuse. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1967. p. 3. 8. Zazulin GV. Liberal'nyi vitok v narkopolitike Rossii dlinoi v 12 let. Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet. Spetsial'nyi vypusk (3604). 2002, 26 iyunya. Russian. 9. Zazulin GV. Narkoepidemiya. Politika. Menedzhment. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2003. 288 p. Russian. 10. Shnaider B. Zolotoi treugol'nik. AN SSSR, In-t vostokovedeniya. Moscow: Nauka; 1989. 316 p. Russian. 11. Bejerot N. Drug abuse and drug policy. Acta Psychatrica Scandinavica. 1975;256(3):277. 12. Chernigin IS. Ugolovnaya politika zarubezhnykh stran v otnoshenii prestuplenii, svyazannykh s nezakonnym oborotom narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veshchestv. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi pravovoi akademii. 2014;3(3):113–5. Russian. 13. Bejerot N. Narkotika och Narkomani. Aldus/Bonnier; 1969. 79 p. 14. Galliher JF. Comment on Weinberg's 'Lindesmith on Addiction'. J Sociological Theory. 1998;16(2):205–6. 15. Galliher JF, Keys DP, Elsner M. Lindesmith v. Anslinger: An Early Government Victory in the Failed War on Drugs. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1998;88(2):661–82. 16. Lindesmith AR. Dope Fiend Mythology. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1940;31:207–8. 17. Lindesmith AR. The Addict and the Law. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1965. 337 p. 18. Weinberg D. Lindesmith on Addiction: A Critical History of a Classic Theory. Sociological Theory. 1997;15(2):150–61. 19. Wikler A. Opioid dependence: Mechanisms and Treatment. Plenum Press. New York; London; 1980. 249 p. 20. Drug policy profiles – Portugal. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu. 21. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2015: Trends and developments. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. 72 p. 22. Sannikov A. Lobbist YuYu – lobbist narkomafii. Tol'ko fakty. URL: https://www.vadimsch. 23. Drug Policy: Preliminary Observations on the 2019 National Drug Control Strategy. GAO-19-370T. Washington, D.C.; 2019. 19 p.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2020-10302
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM