Qualitative clinical and psychological characteristics in the system of assessment of aggressive criminal behavior and social dangerousness of persons with mental disorders
Suggested citation:
Makushkin EV, Morozova MV, Savina OF. [Qualitative clinical and psychological characteristics in the system of assessment of aggressive criminal behavior and social dangerousness of persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(5):56-66. Russian
In this problem article, in order to improve, differentiate and individualize expert assessments of aggressive criminal behavior of persons with mental disorders based on the integration of clinical, pathopsychological, psychological, and situational factors, weak zones in the structure of arbitrary regulation, characteristics of its violations, and targets for expert analysis are identified. While maintaining the basic orientation to the European paradigm, the possibility of using certain diagnostic resources of the North American classification of mental disorders in expert practice is discussed. A projection of significant, in the authors' opinion, socio-psychological and clinical criteria of the DSM-5 on the expert analysis of criminal aggressive behavior of the considered contingent was carried out.
Keywords combined psychological and psychiatric forensic assessment; classification of mental disorders; integrative approach; system of expert assessment; criminal activity regulation
1. Kudryavczev IA. Kompleksnaya sudebnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya e`kspertiza. Moscow: MGU; 1999. 497 p. Russian. 2. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya diagnostika. Pod red. EV Makushkina, AA Tkachenko. Moscow; 2017. 664 p. Russian. 3. Safuanov FS. Problema integrativnogo vy`voda v kompleksnoj sudebnoj psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoj e`kspertize. In: Sudebnaya psikhiatriya. Aktual`ny`e problemy`. Ed. VV Vandy`sh. Moscow; 2012. p. 179–191. Russian. 4. Dmitrieva TB, Shostakovich BV, Gorinov VV, et al. Funkcional'nyj diagnoz v sudebnoj psihiatrii. Moscow; 2001. 196 p. Russian. 5. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th Ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 22 p. 6. Spravochnik MSD. Professional`naya versiya. URL: https://www.msdmanuals.com/ru (accessed: 07.07.2020). Russian. 7. Koczyubinskij AP, Mel`nikova YuV, Butoma BG, et al. Kategorial`ny`j i dimensional`ny`j podkhody` k opredeleniyu remissii pri shizotipicheskikh rasstrojstvakh. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i mediczinskoj psikhologii. 2013;(4):3–9. Russian. 8. Regier D.A., Kuhl E.A., Kupfer D.J. DSM-5: Klassifikacziya i izmeneniya kriteriev. URL: https://psychiatr.ru/files/magazines/2013_06_wpa_648.pdf (accessed: 07.07.2020). Russian. 9. Pavlichenko AV. Nastoyashhee i budushhee diagnoza v psikhiatricheskoj praktike. Trudny`j paczient. 2015;13(5–6):41–9. Russian. 10. Kudryavczev IA, Ratinova NA. Kriminal`naya agressiya. E`kspertnaya tipologiya i sudebno-psikhologicheskaya oczenka. Moscow: MGU; 2000. 192 p. Russian. 11. Agressiya i psikhicheskoe zdorov`e. Ed. TB Dmitrievoj, BV Shostakovicha. Saint-Petersburg; 2002. 464 p. Russian. 12. Safuanov FS. Psikhologiya kriminal`noj agressii. Moscow: Smy`sl; 2003. 200 p. Russian. 13. Agressiya i psikhicheskie rasstrojstva. Ed. TB Dmitrievoj, BV Shostakovicha, AA Tkachenko. Vol. 1. Moscow; 2006. 374 p. Russian. 14. Agressiya i psikhicheskie rasstrojstva. Ed. TB Dmitrievoj, BV Shostakovicha, AA Tkachenko. Vol. 2. Moscow; 2006. 200 p. Russian. 15. Safuanov FS, Makushkin EV. Affekt: praktika sudebnoj psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoj e`kspertizy`. Khrestomatiya. Moscow; 2013. 312 p. Russian. 16. Tkachenko AA, Savina OF, Morozova MV. K probleme differencziaczii affektov u licz s psikhicheskimi rasstrojstvami i vremenny`kh boleznenny`kh sostoyanij. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2013;(5):61–8. Russian.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957Х-2020-10506
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM