Features of behavior disregulation in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions
Suggested citation:
Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. [Features of behavior disregulation in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(6):45-54. Russian
In the original study, in order to identify extra-nosological factors of behavior dysregulation, we studied the relationship between various aspects of self-regulation and individual typological features in a sample of 105 men who committed socially dangerous acts. According to the results of the study specific complexes of individual typological features that reveal the content of self-regulation violations were identified. It is revealed that dysregulation of behavior is accompanied by a decrease in the number of structural relationships between multi-level individual characteristics that reflect the intactness of regulation.
Keywords dysregulation of behavior; socially dangerous actions; individual typological characteristics; self-regulation
1. Tkachenko AA, Demidova LYu. [Development of the general model of self-regulation in forensic psychiatry. Paper 1. The principle of isomorphism]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2018;(5):19–28. Russian. 2. Shekhovtsova ES, Dubinskii AA, Bulygina VG. Osobennosti regulyativnykh narushenii i prinyatiya reshenii u lits, sovershivshikh pravonarusheniya [Psychological assessment of dysregulation of behavior of persons with various forms of mental pathology with a criminal history]. Psikhologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniya [Psychology. Historical-critical Reviews and Current Researches]. 2019;8(1–1):228–39. Russian. 3. Kotsyubinskii AP, Sheinina NS, Butoma BG, et al. Kholisticheskii diagnosticheskii podkhod v psikhiatrii. Soobshchenie 1. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya [Social and Clinical Psychiatry]. 2013;23(4):45–50. Russian. 4. Karavaeva TA, Kotsyubinskii AP. Kholisticheskaya diagnostika pogranichnykh psikhicheskikh rasstroistv. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit; 2018. 286 p. Russian. 5. Savina OF, Makushkin EV, Morozova MV. [The algorithm of forensic expert study of the dysregulation of activity in criminal situation in persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2018;(1):31–42. Russian. 6. Dubinskii AA, Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. Vnenozologicheskie individual'no-psikhologicheskie faktory sotsial'noi dezadaptatsii i kriminalizatsii. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019;1(3(51)). Russian. URL: https://api-mag.kursksu.ru/api/v1/get_pdf/3338/ (accessed: 12.10.2020). 7. Kudryavtsev IA, Lapshina EN. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy i effekty vliyaniya patologii kharaktera na samoregulyatsiyu obshchestvenno opasnykh deyanii. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2008;(3):29–35. Russian. 8. Konopkin OA. Obshchaya sposobnost' k samoregulyatsii kak faktor sub"ektivnogo razvitiya. Voprosy psikhologii. 2004;(2):128–35. Russian. 9. Morosanova VI. Individual'nye osobennosti osoznannoi samoregulyatsii cheloveka. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2010;(1):36–45. Russian. 10. Belomestnova NV. Sistemnyi podkhod v psikhologii. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005;1(10):43–54. Russian. 11. Neznanov NG, Rukavishnikov GV, Kasyanov ED, et al. [Biopsychosocial model in psychiatry as an optimal paradigm for relevant biomedical research]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii I meditsinskoi psikhologii [Bekhterev Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology]. 2020;(2):5–13. Russian. 12. Leont'ev DA. Samoorganizatsiya zhivykh sistem v fiziologii povedeniya. Mir psikhologii. 2011;2(66):16–27. Russian. 13. Zmanovskaya EV, Rybnikov VYu. Deviantnoe povedenie lichnosti i gruppy: Uchebnoe posobie. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2010. 352 p. Russian. 14. Usyukina MV, Kirenskaya AV, Lavrushchik MV, et al. Kliniko-neirofiziologicheskie mekhanizmy agressivnogo povedeniya u lits s organicheskim rasstroistvom lichnosti epilepticheskoi prirody [Clinical-neurophysiological mechanisms of argessive behavior in persons with organic personality disorder of epileptic nature]. Sotsial'naya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya [Social and Clinical Psychiatry]. 2016;26(4):18–25. Russian. 15. Bovin VG. Mekhanizmy psikhologicheskoi zashchity osuzhdennykh s povtornoi prestupnost'yu [Defense Mechanisms in Case of Repeat Offenders]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika [RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics]. 2018;15(4):473–87. Russian. 16. Dubinskii AA, Lysenko NE, Kovaleva ME. Vzaimosvyaz' individual'no-tipologicheskikh osobennostei i parametrov samoregulyatsii u lits, sovershivshikh neagressivnye pravonarusheniya [The relationship between individual characteristics of self-regulation and temperament traits in criminals with non-aggressive delicts]. Vestnik psikhoterapii [The Bulletin of Psychotherapy]. 2017;63(68):125–9. Russian. 17. Martynova IR. Kliniko-psikhologicheskie faktory riska agressivnogo povedeniya u nesovershennoletnikh s delinkventnym povedeniem, ne dostigshikh vozrasta ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2016;6(3):79–88. Russian. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060307 (accessed: 24.09.2020). 18. Van Honk J, Hermans EJ, et al. A left-prefrontal lateralized, sympathetic mechanism directs attention towards social threat in humans: avidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroscience Letters. 2002;(319):99–102. 19. Kholmogorova AB, Rychkova OV. Narusheniya sotsial'nogo poznaniya – novaya paradigma v issledovaniyakh tsentral'nogo psikhologicheskogo defitsita pri shizofrenii. Moscow: FORUM; 2016. 288 p. Russian. 20. Safonova TO, Morozova IS. Urovnevye kharakteristiki samoregulyatsii lichnosti. Vestnik KemGU. 2010;3(43):100–6. Russian. 21. Bulygina VG, Abdrazyakova AM, Kovalenko IV. Metodika otsenki samokontrolya u nesovershennoletnikh. Sudebnaya psikhiatriya. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza nesovershennoletnikh. Pod red. akad. RAMN TB Dmitrievoi. Vyp. 5. Moscow: FGU “GNTs SSP Roszdrava”; 2008. p. 14–28. Russian. 22. Luchshie psikhologicheskie testy dlya profotbora i proforientatsii. Otv. red. AF Kudryashov. Petrozavodsk: Petrokom; 1992. 318 p. Russian. 23. Spilberger ChD. Kontseptual'nye i metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya trevogi. Stress i trevoga v sporte: Mezhdunarodnyi sbornik. Sost. YuL Khanin. Moscow: Fizkul'tura i sport; 1983. p. 12–23. Russian. 24. Knyazev GG, Slobodskaya HR, Wilson GD. Comparison of the construct validity of the Gray–Wilson Personality Questionnaire and the BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004;37(8):1565–82. 25. Enikolopov SN, Tsibul'skii NP. Izuchenie vzaimosvyazi legitimizatsii nasiliya i sklonnosti k agressivnym formam povedeniya. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 2008;(1):90–8. Russian. 26. Rusalov VM. Temperament v strukture individual'nosti cheloveka: differentsial'no-psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN; 2012. 528 p. Russian. 27. Mendelevich VD. Psikhologiya deviantnogo povedeniya. Moscow: ID “Gorodets”; 2016. 386 p. Russian.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957Х-2020-10606
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM