Individual differences during compensation and decompensation in personality disorders
Suggested citation:
Demidova LYu, Gadisov TG, Tkachenko AA. [Individual differences during compensation and decompensation in personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(4):48-60. Russian
In this cross-sectional retrospective study with an objective of analyzing changes in the system of individuality during compensation and decompensation in personality disorders 45 examinees were tested. Temperamental, characterological and motivational characteristics were studied in persons with compensation and decompensation, and comparison group. It is shown that during compensation of personality disorder the system of individuality is poorly differentiated and can be characterized as insufficiently adaptable. Poor differentiation of motivational sphere remains during decompensation of personality disorder; however the rest of the individuality system can be characterized as extremely unstable with the predominant role of formal-dynamic mechanisms. The possibility of combining the dimensional and phenomenological approaches has been demonstrated.
Keywords personality disorder; decompensation; temperament; character; personality; individuality; motivation
1. Gannushkin PB. Klinika psikhopatii, ikh statika, dinamika, sistematika. Nizhnii Novgorod: NGMA; 2000. 124 p. (In Russ.) 2. Kulikov VV, Shostakovich BV, Litvintsev SV, et al. Rasstroistva lichnosti (psikhopatii) v praktike voenno-vrachebnoi ekspertizy. Metodicheskoe posobie. Vyp. 3. Moscow: Minzdrav i Minoborony Rossii; 2003. 32 p. (In Russ.) 3. Pyatnitskii NYu. [The abnormal personalities in the conception of H. Gruhle]. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2017;117(5):72–6. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171175172-76 4. Pyatnitskii NYu. [Stratum theory: temperament and character in G. Ewald’s concept]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov’e [Mental Health]. 2018;16(10):52–61. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25557/2074-014X.2018.10.52-61 5. Shostakovich BV. Rasstroistva lichnosti (psikhopatii) v sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi praktike. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MBA; 2006. 372 p. (In Russ.) 6. Trofimova I, Christiansen J. Coupling of temperament with mental illness in four age groups. Psychol Rep. 2016;118(2):387–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116639430 7. Widiger TA. Personality and psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(2):103–6. 8. Widiger TA, Costa PT. Five-factor model personality disorder research. Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality. PT Costa, TA Widiger, editors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2012. p. 59–87. 9. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(12):975–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008 10. Svrakic DM, Whitehead C, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR. Differential Diagnosis of Personality Disorders by the Seven-Factor Model of Temperament and Character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(12):991–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240075009 11. Rusalov VM. Temperament. In: YuS Osipov, editor. Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 32. Moscow: BRE; 2016. p. 24–5. (In Russ.) 12. Bol'shoi psikhologicheskii slovar'. BG Meshcheryakov, VP Zinchenko, editors. Moscow: AST; 2009. 811 p. (In Russ.) 13. Vygotskii LS. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya. Moscow: AST, Astrel', Lyuks; 2005. 671 p. (In Russ.) 14. Strelau J. Temperament: A psychological perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. 484 p. 15. Borozdina LV. [The concept of personality and character based on the activity theory of A. Leontiev]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal]. 2015;(4):3–12. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2015.0401 16. Levitov ND. Problema kharaktera v sovremennoi psikhologii. In: YuB Gippenreiter, VYa Romanov, editors. Psikhologiya individual'nykh razlichii. Teksty. Moscow: CheRo; 2002. p. 210–4. (In Russ.) 17. Leont'ev AN. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. Moscow: Smysl, Izdatel'skii tsentr “Akademiya”; 2004. 352 p. (In Russ.) 18. Simonov PV. Motivirovannyi mozg: vysshaya nervnaya deyatel'nost' i estestvenno-nauchnye osnovy obshchei psikhologii. Moscow: LENAND; 2021. 272 p. (In Russ.) 19. Leont'ev DA, Nikishov AK. Kharakter. In: YuS Osipov, editor. Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya. Vol. 33. Moscow: BRE; 2017. p. 761–2. (In Russ.) 20. Asmolov AG. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU; 1990. 367 p. (In Russ.) 21. Vygotskii LS. Osnovy defektologii. Sobranie sochinenii: Vol. 5. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1983. 368 p. (In Russ.) 22. Rubinshtein SL. Bytie i soznanie. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR; 1957. 328 p. (In Russ.) 23. Merlin VS. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1986. 256 p. (In Russ.) 24. Nebylitsyn VD. Problemy psikhologii individual'nosti. Moscow: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial'nyi institute; 2000. 688 p. (In Russ.) 25. Teplov BM. Izbrannye trudy: Vol. II. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1985. 360 p. (In Russ.) 26. Nebylitsyn VD. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1990. 408 p. (In Russ.) 27. Bazylevich TF. Sistemnye issledovaniya antitsipatsii v strukture individual'nosti. Vopr Psikhol. 1988;(4):46–55. (In Russ.) 28. Vilenskaya GA, Sergienko EA. [The role of temperament in development of behaviour regulation in infants]. Psikholog Zh. 2001;22(3):68–85. (In Russ.) 29. Strelyau Ya. Rol' temperamenta v psikhicheskom razvitii. Moscow: Progress; 1982. 231 p. (In Russ.) 30. Brushlinskii AV. Problemy psikhologii sub"ekta. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN; 1994. 109 p. (In Russ.) 31. Zwir I, Del-Val C, Arnedo J, et al. Three genetic–environmental networks for human personality. Mol Psychiatry. 2019. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-019-0579-x.pdf (accessed on: 22.08.2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0579-x 32. Kudryavtsev IA, Safuanov FS. Emotsional'naya i smyslovaya regulyatsiya vospriyatiya u psikhopaticheskikh lichnostei vozbudimogo i istericheskogo kruga. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 1984;84(12):1815–22. (In Russ.) 33. Ogarok EM. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya otsenka rasstroistv lichnosti vozbudimogo i tormozimogo tipov: Kliniko-neirofiziologicheskoe issledovanie [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Gos. nauch. tsentr sots. i sudeb. psikhiatrii im. V.P. Serbskogo MZ RF; 2003. 24 p. (In Russ.) 34. Safuanov FS, Kirenskaya AV, Tkachenko AA, et al. [Pathocharacterologic signs in patients with psychiatric disorders predisposed to impulsive aggression]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya]. 2013;6(29):6. (In Russ.) 35. Kudryavtsev IA. [Forensic-psychological evaluation of personality orientation and impairment of social behaviour self-regulation in borderline psychic pathology]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2013;(4):9–19. (In Russ.) 36. Cramer AOJ, Can Der Sluis S, Noordhof A, et al. Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can’t like Parties if you Don’t like People. Eur J Pers. 2012;26(4):414–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866 37. Furr RM, Fleeson W, Anderson M, Arnorld EM. On the Contributions of a Network Approach to Personality Theory and Research. Eur J Pers. 2012;26(4):437–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1871 38. Robinaugh DJ, Hoekstra RHA, Toner ER, Borsboom D. The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the literature 2008-2018 and an agenda for future research. Psychol Med. 2020;50(3):353–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003404 39. McCuish E, Bouchard M, Beauregard E, Corrado R. A network Approach to Understanding the Structure of Core Symptoms of Psychopathic Personality Disturbance in Adolescent Offenders. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019;47(9):1467–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00530-9 40. Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(1):5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375 41. Rusalov VM. Temperament v strukture individual'nosti cheloveka: differentsial'no-psikhofiziologicheskie i psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN; 2012. 528 p. (In Russ.) 42. Rusalov VM. Vklad biologicheskoi teorii individual'nosti v reshenie problemy sotsial'nogo i biologicheskogo v cheloveke. In: Biologiya v poznanii cheloveka. Moscow: Nauka; 1989. p. 109–25. (In Russ.) 43. Costa PT, McCrae RR. The revised NEO PI. Neo-FFI professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR; 1992. 101 p. 44. Orel VE, Senin IG. Lichnostnye oprosniki NEO-PI-R i NEO-FFI. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu. Yaroslavl': NPTs “Psikhodiagnostika”; 2008. 40 p. (In Russ.) 45. Mil'man VE. Metod izucheniya motivatsionnoi sfery lichnosti. In: Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnostika motivatsii i samoregulyatsii. Moscow: MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova; 1990. p. 23–43. (In Russ.) 46. Kharari F. Teoriya grafov. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2003. 296 p. (In Russ.) 47. Steptoe A, Easterlin E, Kirschbaum C. Conscientiousness, hair cortisol concentration, and health behaviour in older men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;(86):122–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.09.016 48. Yakubik A. Isteriya. Moscow: Meditsina; 1982. 224 p. (In Russ.)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2021-10406
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM