Развитие методической базы оценки результативности научно-исследовательской деятельности и управления эффективностью труда научных работников
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Трущелёв С.А. Развитие методической базы оценки результативности научно-исследовательской деятельности и управления эффективностью труда научных работников // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2016. №2. С. 77-86.
В целях развития методической базы оценки результативности научно-исследовательской деятельности научных работников в сплошном одномоментном поперечном исследовании изучены предикторы 5-летней публикационной активности в области психиатрии (целевой фактор анализа). Исследовательская совокупность (выборка), сформированная на основе критериев отбора, составила 85 ед. наблюдения. Получены новые данные о публикационной активности (производительности) в референтных группах научных работников, специализирующихся в области психиатрии. В результате многофакторного анализа влияний на целевой показатель установлена оптимальная модель прогноза, зависящая преимущественно от предиктора "должность". Полученные результаты развивают методическую базу оценки результативности научно-исследовательской деятельности и управления эффективностью труда научных работников.
1. Aleksanin S.S., Evdokimov V.I., Rybnikov V.Yu Science Index – an indicator of innovation activity of Russian authors and scientific organizations. Medikobiologicheskie i sotsial’nopsikhologicheskie problemy bezopasnosti v chrezvychaynykh situatsiyakh [Medical and Biological and SocialPsychological Problems of Safety in Emergency Situations]. 2012; Vol. 4: 126–32. (in Russian) 2. Gilmundinov V.M. Never invent something that there is no demand. Akkreditatsiya v obrazovanii [Accreditation in Education]. 2011; N 1: 68–70. (in Russian) 3. Grudtsyna L.Yu. Methods for the assessment of scientific performance of scientists and scientific organizations.Novyy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [New Law Journal]. 2013; Vol. 1: 106–11. (in Russian) 4. Guba K.S. Publish or perish, or debunking the meritocracy in science. Vopr. obrazovaniya. 2011; Vol. 3: 210–25. (in Russian) 5. Durnev R.A., Zhdanenko I.V. Evaluation of the complexity of scientific research: some results of valuation of scientific work. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii [Modern High Technologies]. 2013; Vol. 12: 40–8. (in Russian) 6. Evdokimov V. I., Glukhov V.A., Grigoriev S.G. Publication activity and scientometrics articles in scientific institutions in psychiatry and narcology (2005–2014). Vestnik psikhoterapii [Bulletin of Psychotherapy]. 2015; Vol. 56 (61): 61–78. (in Russian) 7. Zaynullina M.R., Nabieva L.G., Paley T.F. Organization and rationing of work in the sectors of the nonproductive sphere. Kazan, 2013: 120 p. (in Russian) 8. Kashtalyan A. A. Theoretical aspects of labor regulation in health care. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Vitebsk State Medical University]. 2004; Vol. 3 (N 1): 115–119. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoreticheskieaspektynormirovaniyatrudavzdravoohranenii#ixzz3z1HE3FaA. (in Russian) 9. Kovalchuk A. O. the Importance of training highly qualified personnel for the development of the economy of the country. Vestnik Assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa [Bulletin of the Association of universities for tourism and service]. 2011; Vol. 2: 51–6. (in Russian) 10. Kovalchuk A. O., Hasanova N. In. Foreign experience in training of highly qualified personnel for education and science. Vestnik Assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa [Bulletin of the Association of universities for tourism and service]. 2011; Vol. 3: 78–85. (in Russian) 11. Kuznetsova E.A. To a question of history of the organization and rationing of work. Okhrana i ekonomika truda [Economy and Safety]. 2015; Vol. 4 (21): 84–9. (in Russian) 12. Reshetnikov V. A., Trushelev S. A. Indicators of research activity. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova [The Korsakov’s Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry]. 2011; Vol. 111 (N 2): 76–83. (in Russian) 13. Trushelev S. A. Scientometric approach to the assessment of the flow of scientific production. Eskulab. 2009; Vol. 1: 1–3. (in Russian) 14. Trushelev S. A. Scientometrics of the publication activity in the field of psychiatry/ abstracts of all Russian conference “Modernization of Russia: science, education, technology” (Moscow, 15-17 November 2010). Moscow, 2010: 219–21. (in Russian) 15. Trushelev S. A. Problems of quantitative evaluation of activity of scientific organizations. Proceedings of the international conference “problems of scientometrics. The state and prospects of development” (Moscow, 1012 October, 2013). M., 2013: 116–8.(in Russian) 16. Trushelev S. A. Repository of scientific publications : theses of reports. The collection of materials of allRussian scientificpractical conference with international participation “Medical education – 2013” (Moscow, 4-5 April 2013). Moscow: Publishing house of the First MGMU, 2013: 511–13. (in Russian) 17. Feoktistova O. A. Standardization research: methodological approaches. Naukovedenie [Electronic Resource]. Vol. 5 (24). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/109EVN514.pdf (date of the application: 30.12.2015). 18. Feoktistova O. A. Results of work of scientists: instruments of the state stimulation of quality. Naukovedenie [Electronic Resource]. 2014. Vol. 5 (24). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/110EVN514.pdf (date of the application: 20.12.2015). 19. Khaliullina A.R., Rabtsevich A.A. Motivation of labor in research (design) organizations. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii [Modern Scientific Research and Innovation]. 2015; Vol. 2–3: 106–8. (in Russian) 20. Akl E.A., Meerpohl J.J., Raad D. et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2012; Vol. 184 (N 11): E602–12. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.11112321. Allison P.D., Stewart J.A. Productivity Differences among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage. Am Sociol Rev. 1974; Vol. 39 (N 4): 596–606. 22. Barrett L., Barrett P. Research and development series: The Management of Academic Workloads. London, 2008: 138 p. 23. Fox M.F. Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Soc Stud Sci 1983; Vol. 13 (N 2): 285–305. 24. Gingras Y., Larivie’re V., Macaluso B. et al. The Effects of Aging on Researchers’ Publication and Citation Patterns. PLoS One. 2008; Vol. 3 (N 1). Aticle ID e4048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004048 25. Igoumenou A., Ebmeier K., Roberts N. et al. Geographic trends of scientific output and citation practices in psychiatry. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; Vol. 14. doi:10.1186/s1288801403326. 26. Jordan C.E., Clark S.J., Vann C.E. Do gender differences exist in the publication productivity of accounting faculty? J Appl Business Res. 2008; Vol. 24 (N 3): 77–86. 27. Long J.S., Fox M.F. Scientific careers: universalism and particularism. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 1995. Vol. 21. P. 45–71. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083403. 28. Matthews K.R., Calhoun K.M., Lo N. et al. The aging of biomedical research in the United States. PLoS One. 2011; Vol. 6 (N 12). Article ID e29738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029738. Epub 2011 Dec 28. 29. Milojevic S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; Vol. 111 (N 11): 3984–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309723111. Epub 2014 Mar 3. 30. Mitchell A.J., Gill J. Research productivity of staff in NHS mental health trusts: comparison using the Leiden method. Psychiatr. Bull. 2014; Vol. 38 (N 1): 19–23. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.113.042630. 31. Pagel P.S., Hudetz J.A. Scholarly productivity and national institutes of health funding of foundation for anesthesia education and research grant recipients: insights from a bibliometric analysis/ Anesthesiology. 2015. Vol. 123 (N 3): 683–91. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000737. 32. Saxena S., Paraje G., Sharan P. et al. The 10/90 divide in mental health research: trends over a 10 yearperiod/ Br J Psychiatry. 2006. Vol. 188: 81–2. 33. Science in Russia, 2005–2009 // SciBytes (February 20, 2011). URL: http://sciencewatch.com/dr/sci/11/feb2011_1 (date of visit: 19.01.2016).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2016-1%25x
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM