Комплексный подход к оценке регуляции поведения у лиц с расстройствами личности, обвиняемых в агрессивных действиях
Рекомендуемое оформление библиографической ссылки:
Гиленко Т.Д., Шеховцова Е.С., Корзун Д.Н. Комплексный подход к оценке регуляции поведения у лиц с расстройствами личности, обвиняемых в агрессивных действиях // Российский психиатрический журнал. 2022. №3. С. 26-35.
В научном обзоре представлен анализ современных методов диагностики индивидуально-типологических особенностей, дезадаптивных личностных черт, степени их выраженности, а также способности к осознанной регуляции поведения в рамках судебно-психиатрической практики. Показано, что существует недостаток информативных диагностических методов оценки расстройств личности, рассмотрены проблемы методологических и методических подходов при использовании психометрических методик, анализе и интерпретации данных. Подробно проанализированы диагностические возможности различных методов, проведена оценка их информативности для определения криминальной направленности личности. Обоснованы возможности применения описанных диагностических методик для оценки риска причинения вреда и вероятности совершения агрессивных действий, определения индивидуально-психологических механизмов совершения агрессивных деликтов и для решения прикладных задач судебной психиатрии.
Ключевые слова судебно-экспертная оценка; расстройство личности; саморегуляция; самоконтроль; агрессивность; психометрия
1. Safuanov FS. Psihologija kriminal'noj agressii. Moscow; 2003. 300 р. (In Russ.) 2. Safuanov FS, Kalashnikova AS, Car'kov AE. [Clinical and psychological factors of criminal aggression]. Psihologija i pravo [Psychology and law]. 2017;7(4):44–58. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) 3. Kudrjavcev IA, Lapshina EN. [Psychological mechanisms and effects of the influence of character pathology on self-regulation of socially dangerous actions]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2008;(3):29–35. (In Russ.) 4. Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy: Assessment and forensic implications. Can J Psychiatry. 2009;54(12):791–802. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905401202; PMID: 20047718 5. Perezhogin LO. [Personality disorders in adolescent delinquents as a predictor of criminal activity]. Psihicheskoe zdorov'e [Menthal health]. 2011;9(2):50–2. (In Russ.) 6. Didenko AV. Rasstrojstva lichnosti u osuzhdennyh v uslovijah ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdenij (sociokul'tural'nyj i adaptacionnyj aspekty) [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: FGBU “Nauchno-issledovatel'skij institut psihicheskogo zdorov'ja”; 2012. 49 p. (In Russ.) 7. Spasennikov BA. Kliniko-kriminologicheskij analiz rasstrojstv lichnosti u osuzhdennyh. Crim J Baikal Natl Univ Econ Law. 2014;(2):33–40. (In Russ.) 8. Mohon'ko AR, Makushkin EV, Muganceva LA, Tarasov VG. Osnovnye pokazateli dejatel'nosti sudebno-psihiatricheskoj jekspertnoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federacii v 2020 godu: Analiticheskij obzor. EV Makushkin, editor. Moscow; 2021. Vyp. 29. 203 p. (In Russ.) 9. Gorinov VV, Korzun DN, Vasjukov SA, et al. Sudebno-psihiatricheskie aspekty rasstrojstv lichnosti v ugolovnom processe: Analiticheskij obzor. Moscow; 2018. 55 p. (In Russ.) 10. ICD-11 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 11th Revision). URL: https://www.cihi.ca/en/submit-data-and-view-standards/codes-and-classifications/icd-11-international-statistical (accessed on: 11.03.2022). 11. Gorinov VV, Korzun DN, Vasjukov SA. Rasstrojstva lichnosti: sovremennye klassifikacii, diagnostika i osobennosti jekspertnoj ocenki. In: Sudebnaja psihiatrija. Aktual'nye problemy. VV Vandysh, editor. Moscow; 2018. Vyp. 15. p. 50–63. (In Russ.) 12. Kudrjavcev IA. [Evidence-based possibilities of using ICD-11 in the course of forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of persons with personality disorders (prospective theoretical and methodological analysis)]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(2):31–42. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2021-10204 13. Tyrer PC. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:481–502. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736; PMID: 30601688 14. Gadisov TG, Tkachenko AA. [Syndromes formation in Personality Disorders: Dynamics or Comorbidity?]. Socialnaya i klinicheskaya psikhiatriya [Social and Clinical Psychiatry]. 2020;30(1):88–97. (In Russ.) 15. Safuanov FS, Savina OF, Morozova MV. [Criteria for psychological evaluation of legally relevant emotional states of defendants: methodologicial recommendations]. Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. 2016;(3):46–58. (In Russ.) 16. Dozorceva EG. Anomal'noe razvitie lichnosti u podrostkov s protivopravnym povedeniem: Monografija. Moscow; 2004. 352 p. (In Russ.) 17. Korzun DN, Tkachenko AA. [Violations of the levels of regulation of activity and the legal criterion of limited legal capacity due to mental disorders]. Sibirskij vestnik psihiatrii i narkologii [Siberian gerald of psychiatry and addiction psychiatry]. 2013;(4):68–73. (In Russ.) 18. Leont'ev AN. Potrebnosti, motivy i jemocii. Moscow; 1971. 38 p. (In Russ.) 19. Bulygina VG. Narushenija samoreguljacii u nesovershennoletnih s vyrazhennymi psihicheskimi rasstrojstvami, sovershivshih obshhestvenno opasnye dejstvija [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Gos. nauchnyj centr social'noj i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. V.P. Serbskogo; 2003. 32p. (In Russ.) 20. Lapshina EN. Osobennosti samoreguljacii lic, priznannyh ogranichenno vmenjaemymi [PhD thesis]. [St. Petersburg (Russia)]: St. Petersburg Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute; 2006. 26 p. (In Russ.) 21. Bratus' BS. Anomalii lichnosti. Moscow: Mysl'; 1988. 301 p. (In Russ.) 22. Gul'dan VV. Znachenie osobennostej motivacii protivopravnogo povedenija pri reshenii voprosa o vmenjaemosti pri psihopatijah. Problemy vmenjaemosti v sudebnoj psihiatrii. Moscow; 1983. p. 55–64. (In Russ.) 23. Gul'dan VV. Motivacija protivopravnyh dejstvij u psihopaticheskih lichnostej [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Moskovskij gumanit. Universitet; 1985. 48 p. (In Russ.) 24. Gul'dan VV, Ivannikov VA. [Features of the formation and use of past experience in psychopathic individuals]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 1974;(12):1830–3. (In Russ.) 25. Kudrjavcev IA. Kompleksnaja sudebnaja psihologo-psihiatricheskaja jekspertiza: Nauchno-prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Moscow; 1999. 494 p. (In Russ.) 26. Shostakovich BV. Rasstrojstvo lichnosti. Moscow; 2006. 372 p. (In Russ.) 27. Antonjan JuM, Gul'dan VV. Kriminal'naja patopsihologija. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. 248 p. (In Russ.) 28. Kalashnikova AS. Psihologicheskie mehanizmy autoagressivnyh i geteroagressivnyh dejstvij u lic s psihicheskimi rasstrojstvami, ne iskljuchajushhimi vmenjaemosti [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Russian Academy of State Civil Service under the President of the Russian Federation; 2010. 26 p. (In Russ.) 29. Savina OF. Osobennosti struktury i processa samosoznanija u psihopaticheskih lichnostej istericheskogo i vozbudimogo kruga [PhD thesis]. St. Petersburg (Russia)]: St. Petersburg Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute; 1992. 24 p. (In Russ.) 30. Telesheva KYu, Storozheva ZI, Myamlin VV, et al. [Psychophysiological correlates of personality factors of impulsive aggression on subjects with personality disorders and in mentally healthy subjects]. Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2020;13(1):107–21. (In Russ.) 31. Dubinskii AA. Vzaimosvyaz' individual'no-psikhologicheskikh osobennostei i kriminal'nogo povedeniya u lits s rasstroistvami lichnosti [PhD thesis]. [St. Petersburg (Russia)]: the Nikiforov’s NRCERM; 2019. 24 p. (In Russ.) 32. Kuznetsova NF. Prestuplenie i prestupnost'. Moscow; 1969. 232 p. (In Russ.) 33. Aseev VG. Motivatsiya povedeniya i formirovaniya lichnosti. Moscow: Mysl'; 1976. 158 p. (In Russ.) 34. Igoshev KE. Tipologiya lichnosti prestupnika i motivatsiya prestupnogo povedeniya: Ucheb. posobie. Gor'kij; 1974. 168 p. (In Russ.) 35. Luneev VV. Prestupnoe povedenie: motivatsiya, prognozirovanie, profilaktika. Moscow; 1980. 137 p. (In Russ.) 36. Kudryavtsev VN. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya. Moscow: Nauka; 1982. 287 p. (In Russ.) 37. Antonyan YuM, Gul'dan VV, Kudryavtsev VN, Luneev VV, et al. Kriminal'naya motivatsiya. Moscow: Nauka; 1986. 304 p. (In Russ.) 38. Nokhurov BA. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaya otsenka rasstroistv lichnosti u podekspertnykh, sovershivshikh agressivnye pravonarusheniya [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: V. Serbsky FMRCPN; 2005. 28 p. (In Russ.) 39. Gorinov VV, Shostakovich BV, Ushakova IM. Rasstroistva lichnosti i kriminal'naya Agressiya. In: Agressiya i psikhicheskie rasstroistva. TB Dmitrieva, editor. Moscow; 2006. p. 104–20. (In Russ.) 40. Shostakovich BV. Sudebno-psikhiatricheskii aspekt dinamiki psikhopatii [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: V. Serbsky FMRCPN; 1971. 30 p. (In Russ.) 41. Gorinov VV, Korzun DN, Vasyukov SA, Ilyushina EA. [Modern approaches to the expert assessment of limited sanity persons with personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2017;(3):10–8. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) 42. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ. Human aggression. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:27–51. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 43. Kalashnikova AS, Dvoryanchikov NV, Vasilenko TG. [A review of research on the problem of aggression inhibitors (Part II)]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2014;4(2):46–61. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) 44. Nalchadzhyan AA. Agressivnost' cheloveka. Moscow: Piter; 2007. 736 p. (In Russ.) 45. Lozhkin AI. Psikhologiya lichnosti agressivno-nasil'stvennogo prestupnika (motivatsionno-smyslovoi aspekt). Ekaterinburg; 2002. 136 p. (In Russ.) 46. Savina OF, Makushkin EV, Morozova MV. [The algorithm of forensic expert study of the dysregulation of activity in criminal situation in persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2018;(1):31–42. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) 47. Gorinov VV, Korzun DN, Samylkin DV, Shekhovtsova ES. [Limited criminal procedural competence in accused persons with personality disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(4):49–57. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/1560-957Х-2020-10406 48. Shekhovtsova ES. Narusheniya operatsional'nogo urovnya samoregulyatsii u lits s rasstroistvami lichnosti [St. Petersburg (Russia)]: the Nikiforov’s NRCERM; 2021. 25 p. (In Russ.) 49. Hare RD, Neumann CN. The PCL-R Assessment of Psychopathy: Development, Structural Properties, and New Directions. In: Handbook of Psychopathy. C. Patrick, editor. New York: Guilford; 2006. p. 58–88. 50. Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:217–46. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 51. Skeem JL, Cooke DJ. Is Criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychol Assess. 2010;22(2):433–45. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/a0008512 52. Shekhovtsova ES, Gorinov VV. [Psychological and psychiatric approach to the assessment of self-regulation of behavior of defendants with personality disorders]. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Menthal health]. 2021;(9):44–56. (In Russ.) 53. Flórez G, Ferrer V, García LS, et al. Comparison between the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised and the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality in a representative sample of Spanish prison inmates. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228384. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228384 54. Kreis MK, Cooke DJ, Michie C, et al. The Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP): Content validation using prototypical analysis. J Pers Disord. 2012;26(3):402–13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2012.26.3.402 55. Cooke D, Hart SD, Logan C. Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality Disorder. Institutional Rating Scale, version 1.1. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University; 2004. 64 p. 56. Atadzhykova YuA, Enikolopov SN. Problemy kontsepta psikhopatii v sovremennoi otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi psikhologii. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. 2016;8(1):114–27. (In Russ.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2016080111 57. Butler AC, Brown GK, Beck AT, Grisham JR. Assessment of dysfunctional beliefs in borderline personality disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(10):1231–40. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00031-1 58. Konina MA, Kholmogorova AB. [The Personality Beliefs Questionnaire in Borderline Personality Disorder (PBQ-BPD): Adaptation for Russian-Speaking Selection]. Konsul'tativnaia psikhologiia i psikhoterapiia [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy]. 2016;24(3):126–43. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.) DOI: http://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.20162403008 59. Bulygina VG, Vinnikova IN, Abdrazyakova AM. Predotvrashchenie vnutribol'nichnoi agressii psikhicheski bol'nykh. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Menthal health]. 2012;(7):14–22. (In Russ.) 60. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi TA. General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1990. 316 p. 61. Grasmick HG, Tittle CR, Bursik RJ, Arneklev BJ. Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. J Res Crime Delinq. 1993;30:5–29.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2022-10303
Метрики статей
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM