The problem of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations
Suggested citation:
Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. [The problem of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2021;(3):56-66. Russian
In this scientific review, in order to improve the accuracy of the expert assessment of behavior dysregulation, the necessity of studying decision-making in persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in conflict situations is argued. We emphasize the necessity to overcome the methodological problems associated with the study of decision-making in forensic psychological assessment. It is shown that the state of stress and the semantic content of conflict play an important part in the dysregulation of behavior in acute conflict situations, and that it is difficult to study them in the course of forensic psychological assessment. We propose using the method of modeling the semantic aspects of conflict situations with the registration of autonomic indicators aimed at determining the level of stress. It is assumed that modelling will be helpful in the assessment of decision-making in conflict situations related to committing socially dangerous actions.
Keywords decision making; dysregulation of behavior; socially dangerous actions; self-regulation; conflict
1. Safuanov FS. Sudebno-psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow: Yurait; 2020. 309 p. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/450284 (accessed on: 16.06.2021). (In Russ.) 2. Tkachenko AA, Demidova LYu. [Development of the general model of self-regulation in forensic psychiatry. Paper 3. Appearance of intention]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2019;(2):17–27. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2019-11916 3. Fedonkina AA. [Psychological diagnostics of the ability of underage offenders with immature personality to organize and plan their activities]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2019;(5):55–60. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1560-957X-2019-11946 4. Shekhovtsova ES. [Self-regulation and decision-making in individuals with personality disorders]. Med psihol Ross. 2020;12(3(62)). (In Russ.) URL: http://www.medpsy.ru/mprj/archiv_global/2020_3_62/nomer08.php (accessed on: 20.03.2021). 5. Kudryavtsev IA. [The moral sphere of consciousness of partially sane delinquents]. Part I. Psychological Journal. 2007;28(2):78–94. (In Russ.) 6. Dubinsky AA, Lysenko NE, Kovalyeva ME. [The relationship between individual characteristics of self-regulation and temperament traits in criminals with nonaggressive delicts]. The Bulletin of Psychotherapy. 2017;(63(68)):125–39. (In Russ.) 7. Van Honk J, Hermans EJ, et al. A left-prefrontal lateralized, sympathetic mechanism directs attention towards social threat in humans: avidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2002;319(2):99–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02558-7 8. Safuanov FS, Kirenskaya AV, Tkachenko AA, et al. [Pathocharacterologic signs in patients with psychiatric disorders predisposed to impulsive aggression]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013; 6(29):6. (In Russ.) 9. Dubinskii AA, Lysenko NE, Bulygina VG. Vnenozologicheskie individual'no-psikhologicheskie faktory sotsial'noi dezadaptatsii i kriminalizatsii. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019;(3(51)):238–42. (In Russ.) 10. Makushkin EV, Morozova MV, Savina OF. [Qualitative clinical and psychological characteristics in the system of assessment of aggressive criminal behavior and social danger of persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(5):56–66. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1560-957Х-2020-10506 11. Safuanov PhS. [Topical Theoretical and Methodological Issues of Complex Psychological and Psychiatry Inquiry]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2011;(2):44–54. (In Russ.) URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2011/n2/40889.shtml (accessed on: 16.06.2021). 12. Savina OF, Makushkin EV, Morozova MV. [The algorithm of forensic expert study of the dysregulation of activity in criminal situation in persons with mental disorders]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2018;(1):31–42. (In Russ.) 13. Maksimova NE, Aleksandrov IO, Tikhomirova IV, et al. [Structure and genesis concurrent with actualization of the subject as the systemic evolutionary approach views them]. Psychological Journal. 2004;25(1):17–40. (In Russ.) 14. Savina OF, Morozova MV. [The problem of the differentiation of expert attitudes of emotional States and affect]. Psikhologiia i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2017;7(1):169–81. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2017070114 15. Parahoni AA, Vasyutina AA, Buligina VG. [Special aspects of emotional intelligence and interfamily emotional communication for persons who have committed socially dangerous sexual acts]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law]. 2015;(2). (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015100205 16. Lysenko NE, Davydov DM. [Cardiovascular Reactivity to Emotional Texts in Subjects with Low and High Level of Psychoticism]. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deiatelnosti imeni IP Pavlova. 2011;61(4):423–34. (In Russ.) 17. Slabkaya DN, Novikov AV. [On the issue of experts errors in civil and criminal proceedings]. Matters of Russian and International Law. 2019;9(4A):274–82. (In Russ.) 18. Simons DJ, Levin DT. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1998;5(4):644–9. 19. Cutler B, Penrod S, Martens T. The reliability of eyewitness identifications: the role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior. 1987;11:233–58. 20. Lamb ME, Orbach Y, Sternberg KJ, et al. Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances the quality of investigative interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Britain. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2009;23:449–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1489 21. Ronningstam E. Intersect between self-esteem and emotion regulation in narcissistic personality disorder – implications for alliance building and treatment. BMC. 2017;4:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0054-8 22. Topil'skaya OA. Spetsifika samootnosheniya v strukture lichnosti osuzhdennykh, sovershivshikh prestupleniya seksual'nogo kharaktera. Sotsial'no – ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2015;10(4):153–62. (In Russ.) 23. Kroz MV, Ratinova NA. Osobennosti samootsenki korruptsionnykh prestupnikov. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2018;(4):23–31. (In Russ.) 24. Shaw J. Do False Memories Look Real? Evidence That People Struggle to Identify Rich False Memories of Committing Crime and Other Emotional Events. Front Psychol. 2020;11:650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00650 25. Solntseva GN. Prinyatie resheniya i reshenie problem: Sootnoshenie ponyatii i psikhologicheskikh zakonomernostei. Mir psikhologii. 2016;(4(88)):121–31. (In Russ.) 26. Karpov AV. Psikhologiya prinyatiya reshenii v professional'noi deyatel'nosti: Uchebnoe posobie. Yaroslavl': YarGU; 2014. 164 p. (In Russ.) 27. Konopkin OA. Obshchaya sposobnost' k samoregulyatsii kak faktor sub"ektivnogo razvitiya. Voprosy psikhologii. 2004;(2):128–35. (In Russ.) 28. Shekhovtsova ES, Dubinsky AA. [Psychological components of decision-making in mentally ill persons]. Psikhologiia i parvo [Psychology and Law]. 2018;8(2):1–14. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2018080201 29. Bouffard JA. The influence of emotion on rational decision making in sexual aggression. J Crim Justice. 2002;(30):121–34. 30. Grasmick HG, Bursik RJ. Conscience, Significant Others, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model. Law Soc Rev. 1990;24(3):837–62. 31. Pogarsky G, Roche SP, Pickett JT. Offender Decision-Making in Criminology: Contributions from Behavioral Economics. Annu Rev Criminol. 2017;(1):4.1–4.22. 32. Paternoster G, Pogarsky G, Zimmerman G. Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making and the Accumulation of Capital: Bringing Choice Back In. J Quant Criminol. 2011;(27):1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9095-5 33. Van Gelder J-L, de Vries RE. Rational Misbehavior? Evaluating an Integrated Dual-Process Model of Criminal Decision Making. J Quant Criminol. 2014;30(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8 34. Kozeletskii Yu. Psikhologicheskaya teoriya reshenii. Moscow: Progress; 1979. 504 p. (In Russ.) 35. Bernshtein NA. O postroenii dvizhenii. Moscow: Medgiz; 1947. 254 p. (In Russ.) 36. Sudakov KV, Kuzichev IA, Nikolaev AB, et al. Evolyutsiya terminologii i skhem funktsional'nykh sistem v nauchnoi shkole PK Anokhina. Moscow: Evropeiskie poligraficheskie sistemy; 2010. 238 p. (In Russ.) 37. Uznadze DN. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Nauka; 1966. 451 p. (In Russ.) 38. Anokhin PK. Izbrannye trudy: Kibernetika funktsional'nykh system. KV Sudakova, editor; VA Makarov, compiler. Moscow: Meditsina; 1998. 400 p. (In Russ.) 39. Morosanova VI. Razvitie teorii osoznannoi samoregulyatsii: differentsial'nyi podkhod. Voprosy psikhologii. 2011;(3):106–18. (In Russ.) 40. Morosanova VI. Osoznannaya samoregulyatsiya proizvol'noi aktivnosti cheloveka kak psikhologicheskii resurs dostizheniya tselei. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2014;7(4):62–78. (In Russ.) 41. Fam AK, Leontiev DA. [Individual strategies of choice beyond planning and decision making]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2015;9(2):45–9. (In Russ.) 42. Busemeyer JR, Kvam Р, Pleskac T. Comparison of Markov versus quantum dynamical models of human decision making. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020;11(4):e1526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1526 43. Kuzmicheva ZhE. Personal and situational factors of decision-making under trust-distrust (the prisoner’s Dilemma Model) Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2020;17(1):118–33. 44. Kornilova TV. [The principle of uncertainty in psychology of choice and risk]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2015;8(40):3. (In Russ.) 45. Rhoads SA, Cutler J, Marsh AA. A feature-based network analysis and fMRI meta-analysis of the task structure underlying prosocial decision-making reveal three distinct clusters: cooperation, equity, and altruism. BioRxiv, preprint. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.09.415034 46. Ward T, Fortune C-A. From dynamic risk factors to causal processes: a methodological framework. Psychol Crime Law. 2016;22(1–2):190–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1117080 47. Samylkin DV, Tkachenko AA. [Concepts of the level violation of regulatory processes in schizophrenia: from probabilistic forecasting to predictive coding]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal [Russian Journal of Psychiatry]. 2020;(5):34–46. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1560-957Х-2020-10504 48. Neznanov NG, Rukavishnikov GV, Kas'janov ED, et al. [Biopsychosocial model in psychiatry as an optimal paradigm for relevant biomedical research]. V.M. Bekhterev review of psychiatry and medical psychology. 2020;(2):5–13. (In Russ.) 49. Antsupov A, Shipilov A. Konfliktologiya: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. 7-e izd. SPb.: Piter; 2020. 560 p. (In Russ.) 50. Afrasiabi M, Redinbaugh MJ, Phillips JM, et al. Consiousness depends on integration between parietal cortex, striatum, and thalamus. Cell Syst. 2021;12(4):363–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2021.02.003 51. Kudryavtsev IA. Kompleksnaya sudebnaya psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya ekspertiza. Moscow: MGU; 1999. 497 p. (In Russ.) 52. Iatsyk GG, Vorobyeva EV. [Modern psychophysiological studies of solving cognitive tasks in the stress state]. Severo-Kavkazskii psikhologicheskii vestnik. 2017;(15/2):39–49. (In Russ.) 53. Arutyunova KR. Psikhofiziologicheskii analiz zakonomernostei aktualizatsii individual'nogo opyta pri moral'noi otsenke deistvii [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Institut psikhologii rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences]; 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.) 54. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Raye CL, et al. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science. 2004;15(12):806–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x 55. Sozinova IM. Psikhofiziologicheskie zakonomernosti formirovaniya moral'noi otsenki deistvii v konfliktnykh situatsiyakh mezhdu chlenami svoei i chuzhikh grupp [PhD thesis]. [Moscow (Russia)]: Institut psikhologii rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences]; 2019. 28 p. (In Russ.) 56. Petrovskaya LA. O ponyatiinoi skheme sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo analiza konflikta. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sotsial'noi psikhologii: [Sbornik statei]. GM Andreevoi, NN Bogomolovoi, editors. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta; 1977. p. 126–43. (In Russ.) 57. Rubinshtein SL. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii. SPb.: Piter; 2002. 720 p. (In Russ.) 58. Engalychev VF, Piskunova EV. O novykh vozmozhnostyakh sudebnoi psikhologicheskoi ekspertizy, ispol'zuyushchei tekhnologii 3D-modelirovaniya. In: Sudebnaya ekspertiza: Metodologicheskie, pravovye i organizatsionnye problemy novykh rodov (vidov) sudebnykh ekspertiz: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Moscow: Prospekt; 2014. p. 85–8. (In Russ.) 59. Kholopova EN. Sudebno-psikhologicheskaya ekspertiza: Monografiya. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2010. 461 p. (In Russ.) 60. Krylov AK, Aleksandrov YuI. “Pogruzhenie v sredu” kak al'ternativa pred"yavleniyu stimulov: model'noe issledovanie. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2007;28(2):106–13. (In Russ.) 61. Sovetov BYa, Yakovlev SA. Modelirovanie sistem. 7-e izd. Moscow: Yurait; 2019. 343 p. (In Russ.) 62. Thayer JF, Brosschot JF. Psychosomatics and psychopathology: looking up and down from the brain. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30(10):1050–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.04.014 63. Denson TF, et al. Cognitive reappraisal increases heart rate variability in response to an anger provocation. Motivation and Emotion. 2011;35(1):14–22.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47877/1560-957Х-2021-10306
Article Metrics
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM